Re: A SECRET blueprint for US global domination

Dear WSN readers,
 
I am aware that this forum is not exchanging emails in personal nature but this 
time I have to reply to Prof. Prugovecki because he is turning the debate into 
a personality issue. On my part this will be my last post on this issue 
regardless of whatever emails will be posted by others. I apoligize for this. 
 
I have to say that I am very suprised by Prof. Prugovecki's email that 
describes my post as "scurrilous" and took a hostile stance against it. I went 
back and read what I have written. Honestly all I could find that could be 
described as "scurrilous" is his quotation about my description of Harun 
Yahya's article as a piece of crap. I couldnt find anything else and more 
importantly I could not find anything "hostile" towards Prof. Prugovecki. All I 
did was to reply an email that has some reference to what I have written before 
in order to make my point clearer. If Prof. Prugovecki is against what I said 
about Harun Yahya I suggest him to make some more search on this guy. Although 
it is highly probable that he couldnt find much in English but I'll be happy to 
translate some stuff from Turkish to him. A famous late Turkish journalist, 
Ugur Mumcu, used to say that one of the biggest epidemics of our age is " 
having an opinion before having information". Prof. Prugovecki seems to have no 
information about this guy but he can be "enraged" when someone describe his 
article as "piece of crap". I do believe that who wrote someting is much more 
important that what has been been written in it. I personally wont try to 
refute the arguments by Hitler in Mein Kampf because it is waste of time. 
Anyway I do not wanna go into more personal debate as Prof. Prugovecki did by 
saying "The WSN readers can make up their own minds about Balkan Devlin and the 
way he spends his valuable time." but I think I made my point quiet clear ( A 
little correction, my surname is Devlen not Devlin). Let me stress again, those 
posts especially the one on Harun Yahya is aimed to warn people about his 
personality, ideas and actions because free flow of information can easily be 
tainted by disinformation. And I do not have any "hostile" reaction from Prof. 
Whitaker who originally post the article because I think he understood my 
point. Anyway again I am sorry to use WSN list to reply a personal matter.
 
best regards,
 
Balkan Devlen

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: E. Prugovecki [mailto:prugovecki@laguna.com.mx] 
        Sent: Tue 4/29/2003 11:42 AM 
        To: wsn@csf.colorado.edu 
        Cc: robinson@rojas.net; Annamaria; KenRichard2002@aol.com 
        Subject: Re: A SECRET blueprint for US global domination
        
        
        I wish to thank Dr. Robinson Rojas for emphasizing that the central 
point of my April 28, 2003 post was not who found out first about PNAC, or 
whether PNAC is indeed secret, but what the PNAC blueprint means to the world 
in general, and WSN in particular. The post by Annamaria <vitale@unical.it> 
provides some specific instances of what it can mean, and I wish to thank her 
for that. The information she provides is certainly very valuable, and worth 
pondering about. As she says, "putting together all these reports, it is 
frightening to think what this new world dominant class could provide for us.
        I was in Genova and in all the pacifist march in Italy: what if during 
the next collective demonstration I will find a transnational armed 
"peacekeeping" police (even in Italy), designed to shape social/world order for 
 "freedom and democracy"?"

        The term "SECRET" in A SECRET blueprint for US global domination" is 
not of my own choosing, but it is part of a quote from the Sunday Herald 
article reproduced on http://www.sundayherald.com/27735, and recommended by 
"Richard Ragland" <ragland@un.org> last Saturday. The main point, however, is 
not to argue whether the PNAC document is indeed "secret" or not, but to use 
the Internet and other media to bring it to the attention of as many people as 
possible, and to urge the political scientists and other qualified individuals 
subscribing to WSN to write informative an insightful articles about the 
present and future effects of PNAC.

        I have already taken a look at the website www.rrojasdatabank.org of 
Dr. Robinson Rojas, and bookmarked it for further study. I recommend it to 
everybody.

        In the essay On Some Future Social Effects of the Communications 
Revolution, reproduced on http://individual.utoronto.ca/prugovecki/, I have 
argued in favor of using the Internet as a democratic decision-making 
instrument as well as for disseminating truthful information, which would 
countermand the immense flow of false or misleading information to which we are 
all exposed through the US mainstream media (90% of which are nowadays under 
the control of only 5 conglomerates!).  I noticed, however, that one of the 
main goals of PNAC is to take "total control of cyberspace to prevent 'enemies' 
using the Internet against the US." This should be of concern to everybody who 
uses e-mail and the Internet for exchanging information that is censored in the 
mainstream media, and in particular to WSN subscribers.

        I will not take Mr. Devlin's precious time by answering his scurrilous 
e-mail, in part dealing with, in his own words, "a piece of crap written by a 
fundamentalist psycho." The WSN readers can make up their own minds about 
Balkan Devlin and the way he spends his valuable time.

        Eduard Prugovecki
        Professor Emeritus
        University of Toronto
        http://individual.utoronto.ca/prugovecki/