< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: Roots of contemporary sexism by Shahijm2 11 November 2001 23:18 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
In a message dated 11/11/01 2:23:57 PM Pacific Standard Time, Threehegemons@aol.com writes: << In the last few days we've seen a number of accounts as to why intense gender inequality exists in Afghanistan. Among the reasons I recall: decline in traditional masculine occupations (an explanation that may have more relevance in other parts of the world), men spending their lives in religious schools or armies, rebellion against the Soviet-backed government (an explanation that may have relevance elsewhere as well, not only in formerly Communist states, but also in the US, where the right to abortion is seen by its foes as the epitome of the imperial nature of the federal government), cultural structures that predate the modern world, colonialism, etc, and perhaps, metaphorically, a parallel with earlier persecutions of women that were connected to capitalist transformations. I'm not sure why a number of these factors, in combination, might not be at work. I would like to add one thing more to the list above: Some cultures are very protective of their women. It might look like oppression to an outsider. Women are the transmission belts of a culture. They are the ones primarily involved with imprinting cultural mores on young children, passing down customs, traditions, etc. When a culture feels threatened from outside influences, I suggest that they clamp down on their women because they are afraid of losing their culture. (sorry - no historical evidence for this, only my own observation.) Jane Shahi
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |