< < <
Date Index > > > |
More on Modernity and Politics by Krishnendu Ray 03 June 2003 20:07 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
Khaldoun, I agree that race and Orientalism (as much as class) were central to the construction of the discourse of the modern. I don't think anyone has suggested otherwise on this listserv. But I doubt if it is fruitful to see the whole discourse of the modern developed in isolation by the elites for mere instrumentalist purposes of accumulation. Even elites have to find meaning beyond accumulation. Furthermore the subaltern has some say in meaning making too. All discourses to be successful in disciplining our vision must be dialogic up to a point. Of course that does not mean all voices are given equal air time. Garmsci's concept of hegemony explains the problem of domination with subaltern support very well. Elements of the modern, such as Modernism, are deeply pessimistic, ironic, distancing - hardly cultural modes for purposive, active, bourgeois accumulators. That is why I find it very difficult to buy your narrow use of the concept. I think it may also be unproductive to turn it quickly into a morality play - is it a good thing or a bad thing? I don't know and I don't know whether it matters much. It is the shared modern condition. Wallerstein defines it by the discourse of change. To put it crudely, the modern is when we think things are changing, perhaps too fast and we have to come to terms with it, while the "traditional" is when we thought things didn't change much (even when they did) and we had to find ways to come to terms with non-change. I think modernity produces the polarities of a sterile antithesis, which Berman calls "modernolatry" and "cultural despair." Neither of them describe the whole thing, although both are a part of it. Note that the most virulently anti-modern ideologies are completely modern phenomena. Furthermore, some have suggested that Capitalism is an adequate term and we must not muddy the water with a concept like the "modern." Maybe. But the conversation has already begun, perhaps a few centuries before this Listserv, and modernity, modernism, and modernization are widely used terms and if we are to have an intellectual and political impact we have to engage with that conversation. I in fact think modernity is a useful concept, burdened no doubt with much, but which concept isn't? Best Krishnendu
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |