< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: Kondratieff. by kenneth couesbouc 14 April 2003 12:53 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
Klaus, If you have read Schumpeter, you may remember these curves (Business Cycles, p.213). And have noticed that the coincidence of 1929 and 1987 is just one year out, at the middle of the second stage of the K-cycle. They place 2004 at the beginning of a new longwave. However, by adding a Kuznets cycle, the resulting calendar of growth(curve N°6) is a much better representation of reality than was Schumpeter's original(curve N°4). The "hard times" after WW2 are shown, as are those for the coming seven years. The curves are there, since 1939, and their predictions have turned out to be quite good. But most people won't admit the existance of business cycles. And those who do, seem incapable of explaining them. Schumpeter, for example, seeks their causes in supply and new technology. While carefully avoiding the question of the precise duratuions of the various cycles. I am personally convinced that growth cycles are caused by demand and debt. I would welcome a debate on this subject. Regards, Kenneth ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |