Re: A SECRET blueprint for US global domination

I dont wanna sound cynical but is that really SECRET ??? I dont think so..you 
can even checkout Wolfowitz's memo for DoD in 1992 ( I think) where he talks 
about similiar stuff. I am not American but even I am aware of those reports 
and PNAC since 2000. 
 
Balkan Devlen
PhD Student
Department of Political Science
University of Missouri-Columbia

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Jason Hartwig [mailto:jhartwig@darkwing.uoregon.edu] 
        Sent: Tue 4/1/2003 2:27 PM 
        To: wsn@csf.colorado.edu 
        Cc: 
        Subject: Re: A SECRET blueprint for US global domination
        
        

        The SECRET blueprint that required UNEARTHING can be found here, as has 
been
        the case since release:
        http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
        
        A whole bunch of similar policy statements (and commentary about them) 
can
        be found here:
        http://www.ceip.org/files/nonprolif/default.asp
        
        jason
        
        jason hartwig
        phd student - political science - university of oregon
        jhartwig@darkwing.uoregon.edu
        http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~jhartwig
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: wsn-owner@csf.colorado.edu [mailto:wsn-owner@csf.colorado.edu] On
        Behalf Of E. Prugovecki
        Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:52 AM
        To: wsn@csf.colorado.edu
        Subject: A SECRET blueprint for US global domination
        
        
        The article reproduced below, dealing with "a SECRET blueprint for US 
global
        domination," was mentioned on the CBC program "The Fifth Estate," but 
this
        entire issue has received no attention in the US press.
        
        
        I believe that this article, whose original can be found on the web site
        
        
                        http://www.sierratimes.com/gaddy.htm
        
        
        should be distributed as widely as possible.
        
        
        The text of the report on The Project For The New American Century can 
be
        found on the web site
        
        
                        http://cryptome.org/rad.htm
        
        
        
        
        Eduard Prugovecki
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        Project For The New American Century:
        The Death Certificate For Our Republic
        
        
        By Michael Gaddy
        
        
        Published 03. 2. 03 at 21:21 Sierra Time
        
        
        
        
        
                I, like many other supporters of the Constitution, have been 
asking
        since the 2000 election; exactly what drives the foreign policy of the 
Bush
        Administration. The answer is revealed in the doctrines of the Policy 
for
        the New American Century, (PNAC)
        
        
                Neil Mackay, in the Scotland Sunday Herald, reveals the master 
plan
        now driving this administration.
        
        
                "A SECRET blueprint for US global domination reveals that 
President
        Bush and his cabinet were planning a premeditated attack on Iraq to 
secure
        'regime change' even before he took power in January 2001.
                "The blueprint, uncovered by the Sunday Herald, for the 
creation of
        a 'global Pax Americana' was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now 
vice-president),
        Donald Rumsfeld (defense secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy),
        George W Bush's younger brother Jeb and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of
        staff). The document, entitled 'Rebuilding America's Defenses: 
Strategies,
        Forces And Resources For A New Century', was written in September 2000 
by
        the neo-conservative think-tank Project for the New American Century
        (PNAC)."
        
        
                This plan in its entirety can be found here.
                The plan put forth by PNAC reveals, regardless of whether Saddam
        Hussein was in power in Iraq, an attack there was preordained. Maybe 
this
        can explain why they continue the war beat no matter how many times this
        administration is caught prevaricating about Iraq.
                Inside the document prepared by PNAC is the following: "The 
United
        States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf 
regional
        security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate
        justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the
        Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."
                The document also outlines a "blueprint for maintaining global 
US
        preeminence, precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the
        international security order in line with American principles and 
interests.
        This American grand strategy must be advanced as far into the future as
        possible"
                To facilitate their plans, our military cannot be constrained 
by the
        constitution. The plan calls our military, "the cavalry on the new 
American
        frontier." In other words, the "new American frontier is wherever our
        government says it is." If this is not a game plan of empire, I have 
never
        seen one.
                The thoughts brought forth in this document should scare the
        beejeezus out of anyone who calls himself or herself an American.
        
        
                The PNAC plan:
        
        
                Supports a "blueprint for maintaining global US preeminence,
        precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the 
international
        security order in line with American principles and interests."
                This "American grand strategy" must be advanced for "as far 
into the
        future as possible," the report says. It also calls for the US to 
"fight and
        decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars" as a "core
        mission."
        
        
                1. Refers to key allies such as the UK as "the most effective 
and
        efficient means of exercising American global leadership."
                2. Describes peacekeeping missions as "demanding American 
political
        leadership rather than that of the United Nations."
                3. Reveals worries in the administration that Europe could 
rival the
        USA.
                4. Says "even should Saddam pass from the scene" bases in Saudi
        Arabia and Kuwait will remain permanently -- despite domestic 
opposition in
        the Gulf regimes to the stationing of US troops -- as "Iran may well 
prove
        as large a threat to US interests as Iraq has."
                5. Spotlights China for "regime change" saying "it is time to
        increase the presence of American forces in Southeast Asia". This, it 
says,
        may lead to "American and allied power providing the spur to the 
process of
        democratization in China"
                6. Calls for the creation of "US Space Forces", to dominate 
space,
        and the total control of cyberspace to prevent "enemies" using the 
Internet
        against the US.
                (How long will it be before those of us who oppose this quest 
for
        empire, become the "enemy"?)
                7. Hints that, despite threatening war against Iraq for 
developing
        weapons of mass destruction, the US may consider developing biological
        weapons -- which the nation has banned -- in decades to come. It says: 
"New
        methods of attack -- electronic, 'non-lethal', biological -- will be 
more
        widely available ... combat likely will take place in new dimensions, in
        space, cyberspace, and perhaps the world of microbes ... advanced forms 
of
        biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform
        biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful 
tool."
                8. Pinpoints North Korea, Libya, Syria and Iran as dangerous 
regimes
        and says their existence justifies the creation of a "worldwide
        command-and-control system."
                Our European allies know of this plan. Perhaps that is why the
        administrations plan for "regime change" is meeting such opposition 
there.
                Tam Dalyell, father of the House of Commons in the UK, and one 
of
        the leading British voices against war with Iraq, said: "This is garbage
        from right-wing think-tanks stuffed with chicken-hawks -- men who have 
never
        seen the horror of war but are in love with the idea of war. Men like
        Cheney, who were draft-dodgers in the Vietnam War. This is a blueprint 
for
        US world domination -- a new world order of their making. These are the
        thought processes of fantasist Americans who want to control the world. 
I am
        appalled that a British Labour Prime Minister should have got into bed 
with
        a crew which has this moral standing."
                Ironically, the policies of PNAC were first brought forth in 
Papa
        George's administration, but it was not well received and the would-be 
world
        controllers backed off for the time being. Scott McConnell of the 
American
        Conservative magazine says; "In the final year of the first Bush
        administration, Paul Wolfowitz penned a memo under the aegis of then
        Secretary of Defense Cheney, calling for the United States to ramp up 
its
        defense spending in order to deter any other country from "even 
aspiring to
        a larger regional or global role." China, Russia, Germany, and Japan 
were to
        be intimidated from seeking more power in their own regions. After the
        Wolfowitz draft was leaked to the press, it received widespread 
ridicule,
        and the Bush I diplomats rushed to reassure allies that Wolfowitz's 
views
        did not truly reflect American foreign policy.
        
        
                 But during the 1990s these did become the views of the
        neoconservatives, packaged under the slogan "benevolent global hegemony"
        touted by William Kristol and Robert Kagan. The positions of the
        neoconservative foreign policy team in exile were fleshed out in a PNAC
        book, Present Dangers, which called  for the U.S. to "shape the
        international environment to its own advantage" by being "at once a 
European
        power, an Asian power, a Middle Eastern power, and of course a Western
        Hemisphere power" and to "act as if instability in important regions of 
the
        world Š affect[s] us with almost the same immediacy as if [it] was 
occurring
        on our own doorstep." In practice this meant assertive risk-taking 
virtually
        everywhere. Jonathan Clarke, reviewing the volume in the National 
Interest,
        wrote, "If the book's recommendations were implemented all at once, the 
U.S.
        would risk unilaterally fighting a five-front war, while simultaneously
        urging Israel to abandon the peace process in favor of a new 
no-holds-barred
        confrontation with the Palestinians." This book has become the 
blueprint for
        the foreign policy of George W. Bush."
        
        
                 The most alarming part of this document is the proposals for 
our
        military. Those of us who believe that we maintain a military for 
defense
        are in for a real shock. When this plan is implemented there will have 
to be
        a name change in our government. We will no longer have a department of
        defense; it will have to be changed to the department of offense. Does
        anyone really believe we can accomplish the outlined military goals 
with an
        "all volunteer" force? Or will we once again be required to subject our
        young  people to a draft so they can be made indentured servants to a
        government so  as to "fight for freedom?" Don't forget Secretary of 
Offense,
        Donald Rumsfeld, recently praised our "all volunteer' military as being 
one
        where everyone is there by choice, yet days later froze all lengths of
        service for the U.S. Marines and all forces in Korea until further 
notice.
        
        
                 This plan for world domination, written in 2000, called for 
raising
        our outlay on military spending to 3.8 percent of our GNP from the then
        level of 3.5. With the last increase in military spending by this
        administration, we reached the exact figure of 3.8!
        
        
                 The steps of this plan, which are being followed to the letter 
by
        George W. Bush, will lead to the end of what little is left of our 
Republic
        and a disaster for us as a  nation on the world stage. History is
        resplendent with the tragedies of nations that sought empire and 
failed. We
        will be no different.
        
        
                 All allies will be repulsed at our desire to dominate the 
world. It
        is happening  already. Our European allies have gone from those with
        headlines on 9/11 that proclaimed "We are all Americans now," to disgust
        with our leaders, our foreign  policy and its intended goal of world
        domination. Sure, we will be able to buy some allies, just as we have
        Turkey, but we must be aware we have only  purchased the support of the
        government. The people of the world will never support a foreign power 
that
        seeks to make them all victims of its democratization and moral 
superiority.
        
        
                 When we subdue Iraq, will the oil resources be given to the
        citizens? I think not. A puppet government will be installed and the oil
        resources will be channeled to US interests, just as is being done in
        Afghanistan. Why else would a supposed "leader" of a country require 
24/7
        protection by US Special Forces soldiers from his own citizens?
        
        
                 We call what we seek to impose on the world, democracy. What
        majority of citizens in Afghanistan elected Hamid Karzai to be head of 
the
        country? Could it be coincidence Karzai was a former Unocal employee? 
Is it
        also coincidence the plan for the oil line across Afghanistan is now 
being
        implemented? Could the Taliban have become military opponents of the 
United
        States simply because they refused this same pipeline deal with Unocal 
after
        being wined and dined in Texas back when Dubya was governor in 1997?
        
        
                 What will it take for the majority of citizens in this country 
to
        realize we are becoming that which we fought so hard against 50+ years? 
By
        continuing to implement this policy set forth by Cheney, Wolfowitz,
        Rumsfeld, Perle and Bush  do we not become the same as the Soviet Union 
whom
        we fought so hard to defeat, costing us tens of thousands of lives and
        trillions of dollars? One need only compare the proposed ideologies of 
our
        new neoconservative leaders with those of Leon Trotsky!
        
        
                 Another thing this plan for world domination will bring us 
here at
        home is terrorism too intense as to be imagined. When we have separated
        ourselves from the other people of this planet by our quest for 
domination,
        by what other means will they be able to retaliate? Does the thought of 
Rome
        being invaded by the Barbarians bring forth any visions? If they invade
        across our Southern Border, they will be assisted rather than opposed.
        
        
                 What will become of those here in this country who seek to 
remain
        loyal to the Constitution? Will we not become just as much an opposing 
force
        to those who seek world domination as those in other countries who do 
not
        wish to become American subjects?
        
        
                 How much more of our personal resources will be required to
        accomplish world domination? How much more of our freedoms?
        
        
                 Near the end of my career, I was afforded the opportunity of
        training with several of the Soviet Unions Special Forces troops. 
(Spesnatz)
        I had an occasion to trade an American "T" shirt with one of the Soviet
        soldiers for one from his personal collection. I recognized the word
        "Spesnatz" in written Russian, but was later told by one of the 
linguists in
        our unit what the remainder of words on the shirt translated to in 
English.
        The complete translation was as follows: Spesnatz, Vanguard Of World
        Domination!