< < <
Date Index
> > >
Re: A SECRET blueprint for US global domination
by Jason Hartwig
01 April 2003 20:28 UTC
< < <
Thread Index
> > >
The SECRET blueprint that required UNEARTHING can be found here, as has been
the case since release:

A whole bunch of similar policy statements (and commentary about them) can
be found here:


jason hartwig
phd student - political science - university of oregon
-----Original Message-----
From: wsn-owner@csf.colorado.edu [mailto:wsn-owner@csf.colorado.edu] On
Behalf Of E. Prugovecki
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:52 AM
To: wsn@csf.colorado.edu
Subject: A SECRET blueprint for US global domination

The article reproduced below, dealing with "a SECRET blueprint for US global
domination," was mentioned on the CBC program "The Fifth Estate," but this
entire issue has received no attention in the US press.

I believe that this article, whose original can be found on the web site


should be distributed as widely as possible.

The text of the report on The Project For The New American Century can be
found on the web site


Eduard Prugovecki

Project For The New American Century:
The Death Certificate For Our Republic

By Michael Gaddy

Published 03. 2. 03 at 21:21 Sierra Time

        I, like many other supporters of the Constitution, have been asking
since the 2000 election; exactly what drives the foreign policy of the Bush
Administration. The answer is revealed in the doctrines of the Policy for
the New American Century, (PNAC)

        Neil Mackay, in the Scotland Sunday Herald, reveals the master plan
now driving this administration.

        "A SECRET blueprint for US global domination reveals that President
Bush and his cabinet were planning a premeditated attack on Iraq to secure
'regime change' even before he took power in January 2001.
        "The blueprint, uncovered by the Sunday Herald, for the creation of
a 'global Pax Americana' was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now vice-president),
Donald Rumsfeld (defense secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy),
George W Bush's younger brother Jeb and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of
staff). The document, entitled 'Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategies,
Forces And Resources For A New Century', was written in September 2000 by
the neo-conservative think-tank Project for the New American Century

        This plan in its entirety can be found here.
        The plan put forth by PNAC reveals, regardless of whether Saddam
Hussein was in power in Iraq, an attack there was preordained. Maybe this
can explain why they continue the war beat no matter how many times this
administration is caught prevaricating about Iraq.
        Inside the document prepared by PNAC is the following: "The United
States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional
security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate
justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the
Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."
        The document also outlines a "blueprint for maintaining global US
preeminence, precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the
international security order in line with American principles and interests.
This American grand strategy must be advanced as far into the future as
        To facilitate their plans, our military cannot be constrained by the
constitution. The plan calls our military, "the cavalry on the new American
frontier." In other words, the "new American frontier is wherever our
government says it is." If this is not a game plan of empire, I have never
seen one.
        The thoughts brought forth in this document should scare the
beejeezus out of anyone who calls himself or herself an American.

        The PNAC plan:

        Supports a "blueprint for maintaining global US preeminence,
precluding the rise of a great power rival, and shaping the international
security order in line with American principles and interests."
        This "American grand strategy" must be advanced for "as far into the
future as possible," the report says. It also calls for the US to "fight and
decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theatre wars" as a "core

        1. Refers to key allies such as the UK as "the most effective and
efficient means of exercising American global leadership."
        2. Describes peacekeeping missions as "demanding American political
leadership rather than that of the United Nations."
        3. Reveals worries in the administration that Europe could rival the
        4. Says "even should Saddam pass from the scene" bases in Saudi
Arabia and Kuwait will remain permanently -- despite domestic opposition in
the Gulf regimes to the stationing of US troops -- as "Iran may well prove
as large a threat to US interests as Iraq has."
        5. Spotlights China for "regime change" saying "it is time to
increase the presence of American forces in Southeast Asia". This, it says,
may lead to "American and allied power providing the spur to the process of
democratization in China"
        6. Calls for the creation of "US Space Forces", to dominate space,
and the total control of cyberspace to prevent "enemies" using the Internet
against the US.
        (How long will it be before those of us who oppose this quest for
empire, become the "enemy"?)
        7. Hints that, despite threatening war against Iraq for developing
weapons of mass destruction, the US may consider developing biological
weapons -- which the nation has banned -- in decades to come. It says: "New
methods of attack -- electronic, 'non-lethal', biological -- will be more
widely available ... combat likely will take place in new dimensions, in
space, cyberspace, and perhaps the world of microbes ... advanced forms of
biological warfare that can 'target' specific genotypes may transform
biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool."
        8. Pinpoints North Korea, Libya, Syria and Iran as dangerous regimes
and says their existence justifies the creation of a "worldwide
command-and-control system."
        Our European allies know of this plan. Perhaps that is why the
administrations plan for "regime change" is meeting such opposition there.
        Tam Dalyell, father of the House of Commons in the UK, and one of
the leading British voices against war with Iraq, said: "This is garbage
from right-wing think-tanks stuffed with chicken-hawks -- men who have never
seen the horror of war but are in love with the idea of war. Men like
Cheney, who were draft-dodgers in the Vietnam War. This is a blueprint for
US world domination -- a new world order of their making. These are the
thought processes of fantasist Americans who want to control the world. I am
appalled that a British Labour Prime Minister should have got into bed with
a crew which has this moral standing."
        Ironically, the policies of PNAC were first brought forth in Papa
George's administration, but it was not well received and the would-be world
controllers backed off for the time being. Scott McConnell of the American
Conservative magazine says; "In the final year of the first Bush
administration, Paul Wolfowitz penned a memo under the aegis of then
Secretary of Defense Cheney, calling for the United States to ramp up its
defense spending in order to deter any other country from "even aspiring to
a larger regional or global role." China, Russia, Germany, and Japan were to
be intimidated from seeking more power in their own regions. After the
Wolfowitz draft was leaked to the press, it received widespread ridicule,
and the Bush I diplomats rushed to reassure allies that Wolfowitz's views
did not truly reflect American foreign policy.

         But during the 1990s these did become the views of the
neoconservatives, packaged under the slogan "benevolent global hegemony"
touted by William Kristol and Robert Kagan. The positions of the
neoconservative foreign policy team in exile were fleshed out in a PNAC
book, Present Dangers, which called  for the U.S. to "shape the
international environment to its own advantage" by being "at once a European
power, an Asian power, a Middle Eastern power, and of course a Western
Hemisphere power" and to "act as if instability in important regions of the
world Š affect[s] us with almost the same immediacy as if [it] was occurring
on our own doorstep." In practice this meant assertive risk-taking virtually
everywhere. Jonathan Clarke, reviewing the volume in the National Interest,
wrote, "If the book's recommendations were implemented all at once, the U.S.
would risk unilaterally fighting a five-front war, while simultaneously
urging Israel to abandon the peace process in favor of a new no-holds-barred
confrontation with the Palestinians." This book has become the blueprint for
the foreign policy of George W. Bush."

         The most alarming part of this document is the proposals for our
military. Those of us who believe that we maintain a military for defense
are in for a real shock. When this plan is implemented there will have to be
a name change in our government. We will no longer have a department of
defense; it will have to be changed to the department of offense. Does
anyone really believe we can accomplish the outlined military goals with an
"all volunteer" force? Or will we once again be required to subject our
young  people to a draft so they can be made indentured servants to a
government so  as to "fight for freedom?" Don't forget Secretary of Offense,
Donald Rumsfeld, recently praised our "all volunteer' military as being one
where everyone is there by choice, yet days later froze all lengths of
service for the U.S. Marines and all forces in Korea until further notice.

         This plan for world domination, written in 2000, called for raising
our outlay on military spending to 3.8 percent of our GNP from the then
level of 3.5. With the last increase in military spending by this
administration, we reached the exact figure of 3.8!

         The steps of this plan, which are being followed to the letter by
George W. Bush, will lead to the end of what little is left of our Republic
and a disaster for us as a  nation on the world stage. History is
resplendent with the tragedies of nations that sought empire and failed. We
will be no different.

         All allies will be repulsed at our desire to dominate the world. It
is happening  already. Our European allies have gone from those with
headlines on 9/11 that proclaimed "We are all Americans now," to disgust
with our leaders, our foreign  policy and its intended goal of world
domination. Sure, we will be able to buy some allies, just as we have
Turkey, but we must be aware we have only  purchased the support of the
government. The people of the world will never support a foreign power that
seeks to make them all victims of its democratization and moral superiority.

         When we subdue Iraq, will the oil resources be given to the
citizens? I think not. A puppet government will be installed and the oil
resources will be channeled to US interests, just as is being done in
Afghanistan. Why else would a supposed "leader" of a country require 24/7
protection by US Special Forces soldiers from his own citizens?

         We call what we seek to impose on the world, democracy. What
majority of citizens in Afghanistan elected Hamid Karzai to be head of the
country? Could it be coincidence Karzai was a former Unocal employee? Is it
also coincidence the plan for the oil line across Afghanistan is now being
implemented? Could the Taliban have become military opponents of the United
States simply because they refused this same pipeline deal with Unocal after
being wined and dined in Texas back when Dubya was governor in 1997?

         What will it take for the majority of citizens in this country to
realize we are becoming that which we fought so hard against 50+ years? By
continuing to implement this policy set forth by Cheney, Wolfowitz,
Rumsfeld, Perle and Bush  do we not become the same as the Soviet Union whom
we fought so hard to defeat, costing us tens of thousands of lives and
trillions of dollars? One need only compare the proposed ideologies of our
new neoconservative leaders with those of Leon Trotsky!

         Another thing this plan for world domination will bring us here at
home is terrorism too intense as to be imagined. When we have separated
ourselves from the other people of this planet by our quest for domination,
by what other means will they be able to retaliate? Does the thought of Rome
being invaded by the Barbarians bring forth any visions? If they invade
across our Southern Border, they will be assisted rather than opposed.

         What will become of those here in this country who seek to remain
loyal to the Constitution? Will we not become just as much an opposing force
to those who seek world domination as those in other countries who do not
wish to become American subjects?

         How much more of our personal resources will be required to
accomplish world domination? How much more of our freedoms?

         Near the end of my career, I was afforded the opportunity of
training with several of the Soviet Unions Special Forces troops. (Spesnatz)
I had an occasion to trade an American "T" shirt with one of the Soviet
soldiers for one from his personal collection. I recognized the word
"Spesnatz" in written Russian, but was later told by one of the linguists in
our unit what the remainder of words on the shirt translated to in English.
The complete translation was as follows: Spesnatz, Vanguard Of World

< < <
Date Index
> > >
World Systems Network List Archives
at CSF
Subscribe to World Systems Network < < <
Thread Index
> > >