< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: new immanence - Chirac cheats! by Threehegemons 18 February 2003 15:22 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
In a message dated 2/18/2003 8:19:42 AM Eastern Standard Time, Damian.Popolo@newcastle.ac.uk writes: > Yes it does. If a bucnch of people manifest because of pressures form the > media, and not because of a well thought critical stance, for them to shut up > it is enough for the media to shut up - just like for > Afghanistan (or > Chechenya, for that matter) I'm not sure exactly what 'the media' has been like in Europe, but in the US, practically the only mainstream attention the anti-war movement received pre-F-15 were claims that its leadership is dominated by unpatriotic communists and anti-semites. Bush actually went to court to undermine the NYC demonstration, an exceptional step for a US president. Nor was the Democratic Party encouraging people to demonstrate. As Berlusconi is himself a media tycoon aware that his pro-war stance is unpopular, I doubt the Italian media was imploring people to demonstrate. While Blair has isolated himself politically through his hawkishness, its not my impression that the British press actively endorses an anti-war movement. Steven Sherman
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |