< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: Comments on a Michael Hardt NLR article by Sabri Oncu 01 May 2002 20:34 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
For our information Steve, You cannot imagine how strongly I am against hierarchies of all kinds, whether they are networked or not. I hate all organizational forms that give, for whatever reason, rise to a small group its members gaining a higher status than the majority, which, in most occasions, gives them the ability to give orders to the rest. Just say please, please. Best, Sabri -----Original Message----- From: wsn-owner@csf.colorado.edu [mailto:wsn-owner@csf.colorado.edu]On Behalf Of Threehegemons@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:50 AM To: "Alan Spector"; wsn@csf.colorado.edu Subject: Re: Comments on a Michael Hardt NLR article Just a note--if you are reading this you are part of a network-the world systems network (barring unforseen forwardings, although that would still make you networked in with us). At least some of us find networks, where information can move from any node to any other node preferrable to the centralized bureaucratic models common in liberation movements until recently. Certainly doesn't mean networks(including wsn) are without hierarchy--but they do represent a different form. Steven Sherman
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |