< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: Hamas and all that by Jonathan Davis 08 April 2002 17:52 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Malcolm Pratt" <malcolm_pratt@hotmail.com> To: <wsn@csf.colorado.edu> Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 5:03 PM Subject: Hamas and all that > Dear All, > I am not sure if anyone viewed the `Christian's for Israel' website which > Jonathan's Davies took his `Hamas report' but you will find It very > interesting. The site, as he presumable knows, carries the work of authors > who believe in a very fundamentlist Zionist standpoint. I know nothing about the site. I did a search for 'Hamas Charter' - a well know document - and it came up. > Indeed articles > advocate the killing of Yasser Arafat , (likening him to Hitler and > Goebbels), believe the PLO/PA are terrorists and refute the existance of > anybody called Palestinians or there right to a State believing that they > are Arabs who migrated there or there abouts post 1948. Nothing to do with me - I was simply pointing out the murderous and extreme nature of Hamas. The same document is well known and available from a variety of sources including http://www.mideastweb.org/hamas.htm and Harvard. See: http://www.google.com/search?q=hamas+charter >Some authors also > believe that Israel should keep any land taken in 1967 as it was given to > Israeli's by God and Jeruslam should be site of a new temple [least I think > that is what they mean] and the home of the US embassy too. Muslims are > characterised in an extremely hostile way as are , the UN, and , rather > oddly CNN. The general drift is that Israel should destroy any opposition > and ultimately expel the arab population who are liars and terrorists. Whatever. What do you make of *my* comments on Hamas? > It is therefore in Jonathan's eyes wrong and illegal for someone to forward > an email from Hamas, Incorrect. I believe it is wrong to forward e-mails from known terrorists calling for more terror. As for legality, I simply pointed out that such an action may be illegal in the UK under the Terrorism Act 2000. The original e-mailer is based in the UK. >but perfectly okay to use research that is taken from > the Web site of an extremist organisation with often racist views which > advocates the murder and shall we call it Transfer of Palestinians Arabs. > Double Standards perhaps? You appear to be saying that the messenger is the message? Surly some mistake? As I have pointed out above, the Hamas Charter was all I was presenting - I know nothing about the rest of the site that particular copy resides on. The content of the site - except for the Hamas Charter - is irrelevant to my e-mails. Alternative - red herring resistant - versions are available elsewhere. See http://www.google.com/search?q=hamas+charter > Ariel Sharon, a Terrorist? I believe that he was found guilty by an > Israeli commision of enquiry as being "personally responsble" for the > masacres at Sabra and Chatila refugee camps Lebanese militiamen carried out the massacres, not Sharon or even the IDF. It is a very weak chain of responsibility that links Sharon to those massacres. But who cares about Sharon? Not me. We were discussing real blood and burned flesh terrorists - Hamas. What are your thought on them? >and he has also been indited as > a War criminal in Belgium. So what? Regards Jonathan
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |