< < <
Date Index > > > |
Gunder Frank by Dennis L. Blewitt 16 March 2002 06:04 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
Issues are framed by the powerful to preclude debate. Zero tolerance, patriotism etc.; or they are presented as fait accompli, such as desert shield-storm, Panama, Grenada, etc. When debate might occurr, the media is wired up to present it as the stakeholders in globalization wish. For instance, the occurrances in Seattle were presented to the viewing public as a bunch of radical kids disrupting meetings, rioting, destroying property, etc. The reality was that most were union persons concerned about jobs, middle aged and probably quite conservative. In Quebec, the police state showed its face as far away as Montpelier Vt. Persons at occurrences are framed in such a waythat the media debate ascerts that they must take responsibitiy for consequences rather than question why the occurrence occurred in the first place. Viet Nam protests could not happen today in a meaningful way. There would be no discussion of the war or the wisdom of policy. The press would report on property damage, whether or not alchohol or drugs were present at the protest and the unkempt appearance of the participants. The power in movements is referrent. The spokespersons for any movement has only as much power as the constituency the person represents. 30 years ago, I could win a trespass case against an anti war protestor, cases against the Viet Nam Veterans Against the War and multiple drug cases. I did so only because I had a constituency who packed courthouses during trials to observe and report to others, including the media. The press currently rarely attends trials. The reporters rely on press releases from police agencies or prosecutor's offices. The reality constructed is that flowing from surveillance and punishment. Things can be changed by organizing the victims of the systemitized court. At least 75 percent of the people appearing in the lower criminal and traffic courts believe that they have been treated unfairly. Most judges win retention by small margins due to light turnout. If the victims of the court could be made into a constituency and organized to defeat judges, we could see some changes. I believe that it is too late to change either the legislative or executive branches. To accomplish what I have proposed requires commitment, which I have observed is absent from the youth leadership on which we cardiac patients have to rely Dennis L. Blewitt
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |