< < <
Date Index > > > |
Posthumous volume from Braudel now available by Louis Proyect 16 March 2002 16:25 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
(Although I am not prepared to say that this previously unpublished work by Braudel written in the late 60s is on a par with his others, it certainly seems worth purchasing if you have an interest in world history from the world systems perspective. Titled "Memory and the Mediterranean", it begins with the Paleolithic background and concludes with a chapter on the Roman empire. This is an excerpt from that chapter.) Why was Rome so successful? In this process of conquest, Rome benefited from its central location, which gave it the advantage of overland communications. Roads built outwards from Rome helped to reinforce this natural advantage. In 313 B.C. the censor Appius Claudius opened the Appian Way which ran to Capua and eventually to Brindisi; the Via Salaria and the Via Flaminia ran to the Adriatic, and the Via Cassia crossed Etruria. Rome also had the good sense, in the light perhaps of its comparative weakness, to treat its conquered peoples leniently, deliberately adopting a policy of patience and to some extent fair dealing. Those populations seen as ethnically and linguistically close to Rome were eventually admitted to full Roman citizenship. Tusculum was the first to receive this privilege from the quasi-legendary dictator Camillus. To those less close, a sort of half-citizenship, under Latin law, was sometimes offered. On the sites of former cities, or on land not yet settled, colonies were created, either Roman (in which case they were peopled with Roman citizens), or Latin (with some autonomy but fewer rights than the former). Another possible status was that of ally, socius, with or without treaties granting equal rights. As I suggested above, though with some hesitation, this might be described as a "fair" policy. But was Roman bona fides perhaps a myth invented after the event? Rome certainly made a point of respecting the letter of the treaties, putting morality and legality on its side. But hypocrisy was never entirely absent from a strategy which, after dividing Rome's enemies, now set about devising different levels of status for its new associates. A central location and a common-sense policy would nevertheless not have amounted to much without the backing of military might. Forged in the course of the Latin wars, the Roman legion was the instrument of victory. The first citizens belonging to the five "Servian" classes fought in the heavy armour of the Greek hoplites: helmet, breastplate and round shield; other classes adopted lighter armour, with pectorals instead of breastplates, and long oval shields. Legionaries with low incomes, and therefore poorly equipped, had been granted pay since the siege of Veii (Isola Farnese). The Roman foot-soldier borrowed from the Samnites the use of the javelin (pilum, a long slender blade set in a wooden shaft). The practice became established of disposingthe legionaries according to social status. The most lightly armed, the mis-leadingly named hastati (misleading because in fact they did not carry spears) formed the front lines; then came the principes and finally the triarii, a reserve army of heavy infantry in the third line. This order was more flexible than that adopted by the Greeks. Roman soldiers did not fight in close formation: a gap separated each man from his neighbour and successive lines were drawn up in quincunxes, so that in retreat one line could fill the gaps in another without difficulty. Discipline was strict, even though this was not a regular army. Every night, the men had to pitch camp to protect themselves against surprise attacks. Cavalrymen were as a rule supplied by the allies, but were few in number. Finally and significantly, Rome benefited from division in the enemy ranks: internal quarrels kept Alexander's successors, the Greek kings, at a distance, and the Carthaginians and Greeks were at each others throats in Sicily, oblivious to the world around. Rome took advantage of these distractions to embark on the conquest of Italy, patiently weaving its web, and constantly repairing any damage. In the end, it emerged strong and self-confident, a match for the Greeks and Carthage, greedily eying Sicily across the Straits of Messina and beyond it the rest of the Mediterranean, to which the island held the key. -- Louis Proyect, lnp3@panix.com on 03/16/2002 Marxism list: http://www.marxmail.org
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |