< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: Invisible Strengths by Andriy Horbal 04 May 2001 14:55 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
Just a little remark - Ukraine does not posess nuclear weapons any more. Ukraine had given away it's nuclear arsenal in 1992-93, as far as I remember. Actually it was transferred to Russia in exchange for nuclear power plants fuel and security guarantees from international community (mainly USA and Russia). ----- Original Message ----- From: g kohler To: wsn@csf.colorado.edu Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 9:17 PM Subject: Invisible Strengths An article by Petros Haritatos about "Invisible Strengths" got me thinking about how weak or strong the global underdogs actually are. "Global underdogs" could be defined in two ways - (a) as periphery versus core, or (b) as masses versus elites. Estimating "strength" is an old habit in political science of the kind of Hans Morgenthau and Karl Deutsch. There, "power" is distinguished from "capabilities" ("capabilities" denoting the raw inputs, usable for "power", e.g., 500 pounds of coffee or 500 soldiers or 500 dollars or 500 experts). Here are some simple figures about "capabilities" -- A. First World - Rest of World (1) Who has the world's nuclear weapons? First World:_____USA, France, UK, Israel Rest of World:___Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, China, India, Pakistan
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |