< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: -> Dispensing with hierarchy <- by Richard K. Moore 13 January 2001 12:49 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
============================================================================ Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 10:01:23 -0800 From: David C. Korten Organization: PCDForum To: "Richard K. Moore" <richard@cyberjournal.org> Subject: Re: -> Dispensing with hierarchy <- Richard: This is a brilliant response--deep, poetic, and profound. Thanks for sharing it. David Korten ============================================================================ From: JFadiman@aol.com Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 02:38:23 EST Subject: Re: -> Dispensing with hierarchy <- To: renaissance-network@cyberjournal.org rkm>> Don't give up hope. It's always darkest before the dawn. it looks real close to dawn in Washington these days so I supsoe I should be a bit cheerful. cheers to you in any case. ============= Jim, Is there a saying, 'the darker the night, the brighter the dawn'? I hope so, rkm ============================================================================ Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:12:46 -0800 To: "Richard K. Moore" <richard@cyberjournal.org> From: Rosa Zubizarreta <rosalegria@igc.org> Subject: Re: -> Dispensing with hierarchy <- Thank you so much for this response to Warren that you sent out to the list. I loved it. it made explicit many things about your vision i had sensed but had not heard so clearly from you before (though i admit i've not managed to read everything on your site yet, so maybe it's all there and i've just not seen it!) all best wishes, Rosa ============================================================================ 1/12/2001, Warren Wager wrote to WSN et al: > Returning to that archaic localized, self-sufficient economy and culture is out of the question for all but a handful of civilized folk. They don't want to go there and they won't. We live in a globalized interdependent world. I want my white Burgundy and my Thai noodles for dinner. Don't you? Dear Warren, I fear you leap to unwarrented conclusions. The aspect of some hunter-gatherer societies that I suggested emulating was _not their self-sufficiency, nor their being bound to the local, but rather their liberty, their egalitarian process, and their scalable non-hierarchical power structure. The point is to dispense with hierarchy, not with trade. The topic was politics, not economics. From the perspective of sustainability, we certainly want to swing the balance back toward the local, if for no other reason than to avoid excessive use of energy for transport. If today we depend, say, 20% on the local and 80% on the global, then we need to move this more toward 80% local and 20% global. And that global '20%' would be things of real value or interest (White Burgundy), rather than things we can grow or make in our own backyard. I'm not saying that we legislate this, but that things will naturally go this way once we install an economic system which reflects real costs and real benefits, and which does not permit cartels and monopolies. > I believe that the only responsible answer to the world problematique at this juncture in time is a concerted, planet-wide political movement with structure, fighting force, and ideological consensus able to match and over-match the immense powers arrayed against it. That is precisely what I've been describing. > The anarchist model, however it may be suited to a still later and, one hopes, more beneficent time, does not work for now. How do you leap to _this conclusion? puzzled, rkm ============================================================================ From: Mofwoofoo Woofuaza <Bagelhole1@aol.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:03:49 EST Subject: Re: -> Dispensing with hierarchy <- To: richard@cyberjournal.org, et al Sender: wsn-owner@csf.colorado.edu rkm>> Those 99%, with 'no commitment to revolutionary transformation' are, as you bluntly put it, ignorant of their circumstances. This ignorance needs to be overcome. Dear Richard, I admire what you are attempting to do. I would like to suggest a few things from my experience as a grassroots activist: 1. Its not just a matter of ignorance, it more a case of denial. Its not words thats going to wake up these people, its a "critical mass" situation that will finally bring them around. That's why I advocate building in a practical way, non-hierarchical, low-tech, or high tech (if you can afford it), sustainable communities now, starting with growing your own food. (see <A HREF="http://www.bagelhole.org/">bagelhole.org: home page</A>, under hyperlink "vertical aquaponics") 2. One thing you have not grasped yet, perhaps, is that capitalism/hierarchies are tied in, in a big way, to "sovereign entities" (i.e. nations, states, dictatorships, corporations, governments, etc.). This things are taken for granted. But in the world, you refer to before 10,000 years ago, people didn't "own" land. As long as these sovereign entities exist, we will continue to have all the problems we have, if you think about it. You call for decentralization, well, this is what I'm talking about too. Most Organically, Mofwoofoo Woofuaza San Francisco ================ Dear Mofwoofoo, I understand what you're saying about denial. I'd put it this way, speaking very roughly. There are 5% who initiate, 20% who are early adapters, and 75% who never do anything until they see their friends and neighbors doing it. The movement itself is what will attract most people, regardless of the details of its program, and that is very frightening. That's what enables things like fascism. The 'sustainable communities now' movement is an important part of the overall movement. Those folks are doing the research & development for the rest of us. They are one of the constituencies which can network in consensus with other constituencies, and help build the fabric of the global movement. They ground the movement in economic reality. Your 'sovereign entities' are all examples of hierarchy. Down with The Wall! rkm http://cyberjournal.org ============================================================================
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |