< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
No Subject
by John Enyang
01 December 2000 03:16 UTC
http://www.zmag.org/chiapas1/ezback2.htm
The EZLN is back:
The November Communiques
A Letter to Ernesto Zedillo
by Subcomandante Marcos
November 2, 2000
Zapatista Army of National Liberation.
Mexico.
November of 2000.
To Senor Ernesto Zedillo Ponce de Leon.
Enroute to nowhere.
Planet Earth.
Senor Zedillo:
Six years ago I wrote to you in the name of all zapatistas,
welcoming the nightmare. Many now think we were right. Throughout
this administration, your term of office has been a long nightmare
for millions of Mexican men and women: assassinations, economic
crises, massive impoverishment, the illicit and brutal enrichment
of a few, the selling off of the national sovereignty, public
insecurity, the strengthening of ties between the government and
organized crime, corruption, irresponsibility, war...and bad jokes
badly told.
Throughout your administration you have striven to destroy the
indigenous who rose up in defiance of everything that you
represent. You strove to destroy them.
When you came to power you were free to choose how to confront the
zapatista uprising. What you chose and what you did is now
history. In your role as Commander-in-Chief of the federal army -
and with all the power given to the head of the Executive - you
could have chosen the path of dialogue and negotiation. You could
have given signals of de'tente. You could have carried out what
you signed in San Andre's. You could have reached peace.
You did not do so.
You chose, rather, the double strategy of feigning a willingness
to dialogue and of continuing the path of violence. In order to
achieve that, you tried to repeat the history of the Chinameca
betrayal (February 9, 1995), you squandered thousands of millions
of pesos trying to buy the consciences of the rebels. You
militarized the indigenous communities (and not just in Chiapas).
You expelled international observers. You trained, equipped, armed
and financed paramilitaries. You persecuted, jailed and summarily
executed zapatistas (remember Unio'n Progreso, June 10, 1998) and
non-zapatistas. You destroyed the social fabric of the chiapaneco
countryside. And, following the slogan of your putative child, the
Red Mask paramilitary group ("We will kill the zapatista seed"),
you ordered the massacre of children and pregnant women in Acteal
on December 22, 1997.
We could understand why, being able to follow the path of
dialogue, you opted to make war against us. It could have been
because they sold you the idea that you could take us prisoners,
that you could defeat us militarily, that you could achieve our
surrender, that you could buy us, that you could deceive us, that
you could make the Mexicans forget us and our struggle, that you
could make people from other countries give up their solidarity
with the indigenous cause. In short, that you could win the war
against us. That we could understand.
But, Se~or Zedillo, why Acteal?
Why did you order the assassination of children?
Why did you order your henchmen to finish pregnant women off with
machetes who, wounded or terrified, were unable to escape the
massacre?
What, in fact, did you not do in order to finish off the
zapatistas?
But were they finished off? They slipped through your ambush of
February 9, 1995. They rebelled once more against your failure to
fulfill the San Andre's Accords. They escaped from your military
siege as often as they wanted. They resisted your ferocious
offensive, directed by the 'croquetas' Albores, against the
Autonomous Municipalities. Over and over again they demonstrated
with mobilizations that their demands had the support of millions
of Mexicans. No, the zapatistas were not finished off.
And not only were they not finished off. In addition, they spread
throughout the world. Do you remember the times that you had to
leave, surreptitiously, through emergency exits, events being held
in other countries, while zapatista solidarity committees were
protesting your Chiapas policies? Is there any ambassador or
consul who has not reported to you with desperation the actions
carried out by international zapatistas at Mexican government
events and buildings abroad? How often was your foreign affairs
service estranged because of the failure to carry out the San
Andre's Accords, for the militarization of Chiapas and the lack of
dialogue with the zapatistas? And, when you ordered the expulsion
of hundreds of international observers, did solidarity actions
throughout the world diminish?
And what do you have to say to me about Mexico? Instead of
remaining "limited to 4 chiapaneco municipalities," zapatismo
spread to the 32 states of the federation. It became worker,
campesino, indigenous, teacher, student, employee, driver,
fisherman, rocker, painter, actor, writer, nun, priest, sportsman,
housewife, neighbor, independent unionist, homosexual, lesbian,
transsexual, soldier, sailor, small and medium-sized business
owner, street vendor, handicapped person, retiree, pensioner,
people.
Such were these 6 years, Se~or Zedillo. Being able to choose
between peace and war, you opted for war. The results of this
election are obvious: you lost the war.
You did everything you could to destroy us.
We simply resisted.
You are going into exile.
We will still be here.
Se~or Zedillo: You came to power through a crime which still
continues unpunished. And your administration has been filled with
unpunished crimes. In addition to carrying forward the
privatization policies of your predecessor (and now open enemy),
Salinas de Gortari, you disguised as law that other crime which is
called FOBAPROA-IPAB, which involves not just poor Mexicans
"rescuing" the rich and making them richer, but also causing that
heavy burden to affect several future generations.
For more than 70 million Mexicans, the country's purported
economic solidity has meant poverty and unemployment. While you
have been scrupulously attending to the invasion of foreign
capital, medium and small businesses were disappearing in the
national market. During your term of office, the borders which
divide government and organized crime were erased, and the
continuous scandals caused serious problems in the press: it was
impossible to deduce which news stories belonged in the political
section and which in the crime blotter: "suicides," former
governors on the run, prosperous businessmen who were "only"
tortured, police officers "specialized" in fighting organized
crime taking over universities.
Today, the same as your predecessor, you are leaving with those
who worshipped you, served you, and who served themselves, having
now become your worst enemies, prepared to pursue you. And so,
Se~or Zedillo, you will know, beginning tomorrow, what it is to
be pursued day and night. And it will not last for only 6 years.
Because, beginning tomorrow, the line will be very long of those
who want to make you pay for what you owe them and for insults.
It is clear that we were right when, 6 years ago, the zapatistas
told you welcome to the nightmare. But, now that you are going, is
it over yet?
Yes and no.
Because, for us, the nightmare with you is ending today. Another
could follow it, or the dawn could finally appear, we do not know,
we shall do everything possible so that it will be the morning
which flourishes. But for you, Se~or Zedillo, the nightmare will
only continue... Vale.
Salud, and it does not matter where you hide, there will be
zapatistas there as well.
From the mountains of the Mexican Southeast. Subcomandante
Insurgente Marcos. Mexico, November of 2000.
PS - By the way, before I forget: a year ago, in September of
1999, you sent us an open letter through your Secretary of
Government (and current candidate for the presidency of the PRI).
I believe the letter was called "One More Step To the Abyss," "A
More Ignominious Step," "A More Cynical Step", or something like
that. In it, only 3 years late, your government was supposedly
responding, with lies, to the conditions which we had set for the
renewal of dialogue in September of 1996! The open letter was an
attempt, more than deceiving us, of tricking national and
international opinion. Something which it certainly did not
achieve. Whatever it was, the lying letter told us we would be
pleased with what was stated there, and it invited us to return to
dialogue. It would be discourteous on our part to let it go
without a response, especially now that you are leaving
(finally!). Excuse the delay, but allow me to take advantage of
these lines in order to respond. Our answer is: NO! You are
welcome.
< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
|
Home