WP principles

>I fail to see how "nationalisms in single countries" will coalesce into an 
>effective
>global system change. Even "socialism in one bloc" failed to do that.
>Jozsef (Borocz)

I fail to see it also.  A global strategy is "what is to be done."  
However, within
that strategy and framework, this would or could include the coming to 
power of the
movement in states which support, and have as their goal, global democracy 
and
equality.   The difficulty is overcoming provincialism and nationalism, 
that is,
creating trans-national solidarity.  A World Party could serve, as one 
among others,
the basis for such solidarity.

Don't most people on this list agree to this in principle?  I have the 
sense that
they do.  In fact, in light of all the energy stirred up by the Seattle 
conference, I
think we could probably agree on a number of principles that a WP would 
stand for.