RE: The New Panglossianism and Baby's bathwater (fwd)

fine, but somewhere in your previous posts you said something like
violent behavior (meaning revolution, i guess) is much worse than
non-violent resistance because it leads to dictatorship. honestly,
i could not make sense of the causality between revolution and
dictatorship or why it is less preferable to the latter strategy
(non-violence). if i interpret you corectly, you meant that WP should
follow a non-violent (reformist)path to fight against capitalism. am i
wrong?

then how are you gonna combine your overall views with "being immoral to
let the capitalist market dictate ourlives"?

merci,

Mine 

elson wrote:

>You wrote  "... to call capitalists immoral..."    This is an incorrect
>statement of what I wrote.  I didn't call capitalists immoral as you
>claim.
>I wrote that people, like Groves, are "immoral to let the CAPITALIST
>MARKET
>(the relations among commodities) dictate our lives."

>Further, I raised the point about the immorality of capitalist markets in
>response to Groves who was justifying the wealth of the captialists.