Re: Communist Failure and Markets

 Dear Friends,

 I have made the World Party without relation to you. I am working to 
establish the
World Government. Some people wrote about Marxism and dependency theory. 
These are
mentioned in the paper
"World Government: The Best Economic Theory."
http://www3.justnet.ne.jp/~toshio-suzuki/best-policy.htm
This paper insists that the best economic policy is to establish the World
Government. Marx's theory and dependency theory are mentioned. The paper 
says that
these two theory do not contradict each other. They are still alive. But 
World Party
supports the liberal economic system. This is because communism is not 
practical. We
need socialistic policy. But the basic system should be liberalism or 
capitalism.

                                               Yours sincerely
                                                Toshio Suzuki

WORLD GOVERNMENT INSTITUTE
Institute to Establish the World Government
http://www3.justnet.ne.jp/~toshio-suzuki/
mailto:toshio-suzuki@ma3.justnet.ne.jp

WORLD PARTY & WORLD CITIZEN PARTY NETWORK
International Party and Network to Establish the World Government
http://www3.justnet.ne.jp/~toshio-suzuki/wp.htm
mailto:toshio-suzuki@ma3.justnet.ne.jp



John_R_Groves@ferris.edu wrote:

> Dear Alan and Randall: I agree with Randall's response to Alan. I, too, am
> critical of capitalism. And I also agree that it wasn't just the 
>particular
> historical manifestation of Marxism that failed; there are basic problems 
>with
> the general theory. Take, for example, markets (no, they aren't free; they
> always exist within a particular legal framework which favors some more 
>than
> others). Markets are quite good at pricing goods. If one central 
>authority has
> to price all the goods to be sold they will find themselves overwhelmed 
>by the
> task. The same goes for production decisions. How in the world do we 
>decide how
> many size 10, brown wing-tip shoes to produce and then how much do we 
>charge for
> them? Ok, now how many size 9's? And now keep going until you cover all 
>the
> goods sold. The Soviets found that the biggest, fastest supercomputers 
>they
> could find were not up to the task. Nor would any present-day computers, 
>since
> such matters are subject to fickle fashion and taste. It is no surprise 
>that the
> Soviets could never quite get any of this right; no one could! That is 
>why they
> were constantly best by shortages and lines. I would therefore argue that 
>we
> utilize markets, but that we also keep on eye on the legal framework to 
>counter
> the injustices and other problems that arise. All for now.  Randy Groves