< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
socialism, Berlin Wall, and so on
by rpompeu
19 November 1999 22:07 UTC
Hi, about socialism or communism, we must remark that nobody knows what
Marx
thought communism should or would be. A few years before he died, he said
that
he had made just two discoveries: the origin of surplus-value and the fact
that capitalism is not eternal. As for communism he just left some vague
phrases about it being based in public property and workers' control.
The so-called real socialism, Stalinist socialism and so on also does not
help
us to understand what communismo should or would be. They were installed
mostly in backward countries, in which accumulation was not entirely or
mostly
capitalist. As a matter of fact, they were rather pre-capitalist regimes,
in
which the State accumulated assets in order to invest by way of what Marx
would have called primitive accumulation. There were many ways to do this:
to
reduce consommation to the minimum necessary to live and to work, slave
labour, forced sparing, and so on. This kind of system permits a rapid
development in conditions of stable technology, but it does not permit to
develop technology. Even before Gorbachev, a Soviet economist asked in an
article: "We may plan agriculture, we may plan industry, we may plan even
free-wandering in holidays, but we cannot plan technological progress." One
does never know which result an experiment will produce.
Technological progress is not planned in capitalism too, it is developped
by
way of competition, with bankruptcies, unemployment, lowering of wages,
marginalisation and so on. What should be the solution? Planning
technological
progress must be global, we must have a world government that will regulate
the fluxes of investments and of financial exchanges.
Thank you for your attention.
Renato Pompeu - Sao Paulo, Brazil
< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
|
Home