< < < Date > > > | < < < Thread > > >

praxeology of world change

by richardsonofnc

18 November 1999 00:27 UTC


From David Richardson, ISCSC
 
 
Gert Kohler's idea of modern praxis are upbeat and so, too, are most of the opinions
aired at WSN.   The attitude was utterly different a century ago +/-.   I mention some
pessimists:  Arthur de Gobineau, Jacob Burckhardt, Friedrich Nietzshe, Henry and Brooke Adams, W.E.B. Du Bois, Oswald Spengler and his most powerful admirers, Adolph Hitler and his retinue, Nietzsche soeur and her prestigious library, The Frankfort School and Herbert Marcuse, Sartre, Foucault, Fanon, Horkheimer and Adorno, Norman Mailer, and many other famed authors.  They took the successes of colonialism too seriously.  Mommsen (Nobel prize, 1805) probably chose Rome as his theme and was
celebrated partly for the same reason: the final solution seemed to be empire.   Hitler was both a monster and an idealist: to produce Spengler's final work of creativity, a totalitarian empire (which is the form of empire Spengler preferred).
 
Who looks to empire, today?

< < < Date > > > | < < < Thread > > > | Home