Re: Which Marxism? (fwd)

On Sun, 6 Jun 1999, elson wrote:
>
>This more or less jibes with my reading of Marx.  I'd point out, however,
>that wage-labor is still a minority of forms of production even within core
>areas.  So, Marx was off on the point of England showing the future to the
>rest of the world.

Except that Marx was talking about production for exchange-values which
makes him correct, especially in the core. Moreover, capitalist production
subsumes under itself at a certain point other forms of production. This
is why the character of the system is capitalist.

Andy