Re: pie and getting the DOL straight

Yes. I believe this is correct.

On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, elson wrote:

>the core does not have a separate "growth dynamic" from the periphery
>since core and periphery are part of the same system.
>
>IW argues that there is development of the system which results in core and
>peripheral areas.   States don't have their own economies, hence they can't
>have their own "logic of development."  What happens in part of the system)
>is a result of the development of the whole system (including that part).
>
>Again, one must focus on the meaning of a single division of labor in which
>core and periphery have different roles.   If this basic observation is not
>grasped, then the ws perspective can't be grasped.