Carolyn,
How are Moore's vacuous posts hubris on my part? What logic does this
argument rest on? And how is advocating an open system and concrete
analysis dogma? The only dogma here is Moore's blatant corporatist
rhetoric and anti-communism. And Moore's claim that he need not read any
literature in this area is the epitome of hubris. The ad hominem launched
in your post doesn't swing this "debate" in your and Richard's
"innovative" direction, Carolyn. Quite the opposite, in fact; it exposes
the paucity of the views, albeit nebulous, advanced on your side.
Evidently some loyalty to Richard Moore has dispossed you of the ability
to be even remotely objective in your assessment of the "Moore-Austin
Debate."
Andy