Received: from jhuml1.hcf.jhu.edu (jhuml1.hcf.jhu.edu [128.220.2.86]) by jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id MAA15276 for <chriscd@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu>; Sun, 7 Dec 1997 12:11:51 -0500
Received: from sleeper.sheridanc.on.ca by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu
(PMDF V5.1-10 #18666) with ESMTP id <01IQW4CVJ8TAAPU07T@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu>
for chriscd@jhunix.hcf.jhu.edu; Sun, 7 Dec 1997 12:09:41 EDT
Received: from atlas.sheridanc.on.ca (atlas.sheridanc.on.ca [142.55.114.50])
by sleeper.sheridanc.on.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA08929 for
<chriscd@jhu.edu>; Sun, 07 Dec 1997 12:09:36 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 12:09:36 -0500 (EST)
From: Gernot Kohler <gernot.kohler@sheridanc.on.ca>
Subject: Amin's Agenda for Action (fwd)
To: chriscd@jhu.edu
Message-id: <Pine.OSF.3.91.971207120329.28320A-100000@atlas.sheridanc.on.ca>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Dear Professor Chase-Dunn,
The attached post to wsn was not circulated. Now I am wondering, was it a
computer/software problem or was the post inappropriate for wsn?
Please advise.
Thank you,
Gernot Kohler
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 1997 08:57:04 -0500 (EST)
From: Gernot Kohler <kohler@sheridanc.on.ca>
To: wsn@csf.colorado.edu
Subject: Amin's Agenda for Action
A summary of Professor Samir Amin's agenda for global action is contained in:
REFERENCE:
Samir Amin,
"The Future of Global Polarization",
_REVIEW_ (Fernand Braudel Center), XVII, 3, Summer 1994, p. 337-47
Professor Amin's project of global socialism is based on the general
observation that: "The commanding logic of the capitalist system
perpetuates the center/periphery polarization." (p. 346)
The overall task, according to Amin, is therefore "the construction of a
[sc. alternative] global political system which is not in the service of
the global market but which defines its parameters..."(p. 342) For the
shape of such an alternative world system, Amin insists on two general
ingredients, namely:
(a) the world system must be "more authentically democratic" (p. 347)
(b) the world system must be polycentric, meaning "reorganization
... on the basis of large regions" (p. 347) (e.g., region of Europe,
Africa, etc.)
Amin's preferred world system is thus democratic, socialist and
polycentric/federalist (rather than dominated by "the five monopolies" of
the core countries). Based on this general vision, Professor Amin's
agenda includes the following, by broad domains (see, p. 342):
A. MILITARY: "global disarmament"
B. POLITICAL: "world parliament"; "political institutions which would
represent social interests on a global scale"
C. ECONOMIC-POLITICAL:
1. "liquidation of ... World Bank, the IMF, GATT, etc.", to be replaced
by "other systems for managing the global economy"
2. "global fiscal system"
3. "flexible economic relationships among the world's major regions which
are unequally developed" (i.e. Amin's concept of polycentrism)
D. ECOLOGICAL: "access to the planet's resources in an equitable manner";
"waste reduction obligatory"
How to achieve this: Amin emphasizes "struggle": "transformation of the
world system always begins with struggles at its base" (p. 347). He is
not explicit about the use of violence, however.
Which makes me wonder. If his "struggle" means non-violent struggle, then
his agenda is not terribly different from what globally and
ecologically-minded left-Keynesians believe in.
Note that Professor Amin does not call for an abolition of the market
but, rather, for world political institutions which "define the
parameters of" the market. Professor Keynes could agree to that. Which
brings me to a general point: Left-Keynesianism is not "Military
Keynesianism". Left-Keynesianism is to Keynes what left-Hegelianism was
to Hegel, n'est-ce pas? Left-Keynesianism is one of the ten legitimate
tribes of Leftism.
Regards,
Gernot Kohler
Oakville, Canada