11/07/97, Danilo D'Antonio wrote:
>I wish only do a modest reflection on globalism and globalization.
>If inside
>this globalization process there are certain and well recognized advantages
>(it is well known that through it the wellbeing and the prosperity increase
>everywhere in the world)...
Whoa!! Allow me to suggest that such an outcome is not at all "well
known", unless you mean in the sense of "disinformation widely swallowed".
On both empirical and theoretical grounds I find such a characterization
dubious at best.
>Usually we use the term globalism to define something similar to a vision of
>the world: to see how the whole is so deeply interconnected that even the
>action of few people can influence the life of all the others...
As I'll be using the terms, globalization is the process, globalism is the
philosophy, and both refer to a concious elite program of power usurpation.
Apologies if this seems like language usurpation. (:>)
rkm