I had written:
>>worker-solidarity on a global basis seems to have difficulties of many kinds.
8/19/97, Andrew *Hund* wrote:
>It was a passing thought.
But an important one. If we can't even seek worker solidarity, then what
hope to reverse globalization? I passed on Greider's comment because it
contains an unfortunate element of truth, that must be taken into account.
How could the interests of workers at different rungs of the economic
ladder be harmonized in a single progressive framework? In what terms
could solidarity be formulated?
rkm