< < <
Date Index > > > |
Arguments 3. by kenneth couesbouc 06 May 2003 16:32 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
In the exchange for commodities, currency measures the value of labour, past and present. Part of this measured value renews demand for commodities(1). The other part renews demand for commodities(2). Transforming renewed demand into increased demand can be acheived in several ways. But, in all cases, growth in demand must begin with commodities(1). One way of increasing demand for both categories, is for currency to circulate faster from exchange to exchange. New forms of currency, such as bank cards, or new forms of production, which avoid stock piling, or new forms of transport, such as containers, all contribute to this acceleration. But, by its very nature, this method of increasing demand is impossible to master and has obvious historical limits. Uncontrolled, it tends to be inflationary. Ever since currency has been used to measure the value of exchanges, demand for commodities(1) has increased because profits were not renewing demand for commodities(2). This insufficient demand for commodities(2), which are the terminal result of production, can be solved by borrowing and by a constant reduction in the value of commodities. Demand for commodities(1) can also increase by borrowing. Borrowing increases the value of currency in circulation, a currency "creation". All currency being but promises to pay, gareteed by banks and, ultimately, by the Central Bank and the State. This borrowed currency increases demand for commodities(1). An increased demand which puts into motion more labour. Extra labour is added to extra labour and, at each measured exchange, more currency must be borrowed. And so to the terminal stage of commodities(2). But, demand for commodities(2) is always insufficient. As part of the value, added by labour and exchanged for currency, is sidetracked at each stage of the production process. This constant insufficiency of demand for commodities(2) beats down prices and puts firms out of business. But, when development is strong, the State may decide to sustain demand for commodities(2), by garenteeing borrowing to that effect. The State may do some borrowing itself, and distribute the extra currency as wages, welfare, war, etc. Currency used to be exclusively backed by gold. Which ment that increasing the quantity of currency in circulation depended on an equivalent increase in bullion. This is no longer the case. At present, currency is backed by a variety of values, such as bonds, stocks, foreign currencies, real estate, etc. Which means that currency creation is virtually unlimited and the same goes for borrowing. Borrowing increases demand for commodities(1) and sustains demand for commodities(2). But, unlimited borrowing to sustain demand for commodities(2), means that an ever greater part of the value added by labour can be sidetracked. The result is an ever greater demand for commodities(1) and an ever greater need to sustain demand for commodities(2). Kenneth ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |