Re: WSN--what's up?

Steve,

Why set yourself up for more work than is necessary?

Although, in most cases, I prefer discussions that stay close to the
target subject, I can easily delete those for which I have no
interest.  If someone posts something, they are interested, and they
assume someone else will be, as well.  If not, no one will
respond.  It's simple and it's empirical.

Deleting is easier than monitoring.

Jerry Shepperd

At 09:20 PM 5/4/03 -0400, Threehegemons@aol.com wrote:
> Every so often wsn skids off the
> tracks.  It's my impression that this is happening now.  I
> suspect many people subscribe to discuss world events/theories influenced
> by such thinkers as Wallerstein, Gunder-Frank, etc, rather than David
> Duke.  Should I be moderating more aggressively?  As it is, I'm
> pretty close to unsubscribing.
>
> Steven Sherman

"To announce that there must be no criticism of the president, or that we are to stand by the president right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American Public." 
                        -- Theodore Roosevelt

"People acting together as a group can accomplish things which no individual acting alone could ever hope to bring about."
                        -- Franklin Delano Roosevelt

"Do you want to know who you are? Don't ask. Act! Action will delineate and define you."
                        -- Thomas Jefferson -