Re: Zionism, supremacist doctrines and PNAC

what Shamir said was to point out the ad hominem fallacy, demonizing 
anybody so that no matter what they say is always wrong, which of course is 
an absurdity. in politics especially, no one is always wrong or always right.
anyone who disagrees please explain the difference between political 
correctness and censorship?
i'd also ask mr Parry if he thinks the Palestinians' problem can be solved 
without tackling the problem of zionist power by the horns? equally absurd.
as for the slogan "the end does not justify the means" - its connection 
with the current argument must surely be that ad hominem tactics are not 
justified, no matter how abhorrent some people think Duke or Shamir or 
anyone else is whom they disagree with.

At 11:29 4.5.03 -0800, Michael Pugliese wrote:
>   Re: Israel Shamir, specifically, he recently said on his website that 
> the voice of a David Duke should be listened to. Need the URL I'll dig it up.
>  Nigel Parry of the Electronic Intifada has a large dossier on Shamir.
>   <URL: http://nigelparry.com/issues/shamir/ >
> THE ISRAEL SHAMIR CASE
> THE END DOES NOT JUSTIFY THE MEANS