|
< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: We have the Proof! by John Leonard 09 February 2003 05:25 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
The real 'motive' behind the brazenly confident US warplans (indeed how sexy it is!) as it is being communicated to its allies in Europe, may perhaps be paraphrased as follows: 'you guys (Europe) did it (invaded Iraq, India, China, and many other places) in your time. You no longer can get it up. Now is my time to do the same, I have the guns and I have the men, so what is your problem? Why are you acting so hypocritical? Britain at least is not showing your scruples. Best if you kept quiet and shared in the spoils'. MS.
John Leonard wrote:
Powell was a howl and his proof was a spoof.
This is exactly like the fake satellite photos of massed Iraqi tanks, and
the phony incubator atrocity they used to start the 1st Gulf War.
Next their Army will go in there and plant evidence of WMD. The biochem
stuff they used to have was from the US anyway, when the US armed both
sides and instigated the Iran - Iraq conflict.
Born in genocide, America has mass murder in its genes, and needs only the
flimsiest fig leaf for a green signal.
~~~~~~
Part 1 of my unreleased work is on the subject of this fakery
I. Putschist Bush Fakes Facts to Attack Iraq
In the shadow and thunder of the evil empire's gathering war cloud over
Iraq, I shout to show how the lying pair of Bush and Blair sow the illusion
of a threat from there...
Lies father, lies son. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree, and the
shrub is a twig off the old bush. Twelve years ago, these were the lies the
first family foisted on gullible us, to engulf us in war: massed infantry
and mass infanticide.
They boasted of satellite photos - ever so secret, not to be shown, but
showing a quarter-million man Iraqi army, poised to pounce on our oil pump
in Saudia Arabia. Yet other eyes in the sky saw no platoons in the dunes,
no Iraqi tanks, just swarms of Yank warplanes massed for attack? Trust us,
they said.
"This administration is capable of any lie ... in order to advance its war
goal in Iraq," says a US government source... it doesn't want to have UN
weapons inspectors go back in, because they might actually show that the
probability of Iraq having [threatening illicit weapons] is much lower than
they want us to believe...." [1]
The babycide was for us amnesiacs, who always forget Britain's 1914
propaganda coup, Germans cutting off the hands of babes in Belgium. This
time a top PR firm coached the Kuwaiti ambassador's daughter in theatrics
for a Congressional caucus. Story board: Iraqi troops leave 312 incubator
babies on a hospital floor to die. The grisly tear-jerker carried the
motion for war.
Who ever heard of a hospital with 312 incubators?[2] Why not 322? When was
common sense banished from the republic? Perhaps only mothers should be
allowed to run for Congress.
During the slaughter, Stormin' Norman Schwarzkopf, the Desert
Sturmtruppenführer and propaganda genius, claimed a kill of seven Iraqi
mobile missile launchers - but the CIA said they were just oil tankers.
[3] And now it's the CIA that points out that an attack on Iraq increases
the threat of terror. Which is just what the boss wants.
The motives of the US-UK bandits today are clear - to destroy Iraq, its
people and potential. Not Saddam Hussein, who started as CIA asset and
stayed on as bogeyman for target practice. As a bush chickenhawk recently
gave his raison de guerre: "Just think, if only Iraq were like Egypt."
Quite, without industry and dependent on handouts.
The visionary French canal-builder De Lesseps recounted his meeting with PM
Palmerston: "He spoke with me, with regard to the Suez Canal, in the most
contradictory, the most incoherent, and, I will even add, the most
senseless fashion imaginable.... I could not help asking myself now and
again whether I was in the presence of a maniac or a statesman... We now
know the true motives of Lord Palmerston's opposition. It is that he is
afraid of favoring the development of Egypt's power and
prosperity."[4] He could hardly have been more incoherent than the Bush
regime's war pretexts. The motives of the US-UK axis vis-a-vis the Middle
East and all Eurasia are the same, too.
"British foreign policy, for the last 200 years, has been based on one
central idea, the break-up of other empires."[5]
In "Last Sunny Days," Israel Shamir relates how "a suspected Israeli mole,
calls for seizure of the Arabian oil fields, transfer of Mecca and Medina
unto Hashemite rule and confiscation of Saudi assets," and finds Prof.
David D. Perlmutter in the LA Times (April 7, 2002) is even more explicit:
"I daydream - if only! If in 1948, 1956, 1967 or 1973 Israel had acted just
a bit like the Third Reich, then today Jews, not sheiks, would have that
Gulf oil.' " Don't fret, David. A British MP recently detailed the current
US-UK plan to take out all the major Middle East governments, take over the
oilfields, and install their puppets in power.[6]
[1] From "In war, some facts less factual," by Scott Peterson, Christian
Science Monitor, Sept. 6, 2002,
<http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0906/p01s02-wosc.html>http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/0906/p01s02-wosc.html
[2] Exposed by John R. MacArthur, Publisher of Harper's Magazine, in his
book "Second Front." See lecture transcript
at <http://www.independent.org/tii/content/events/f_macarth.html>http://www.independent.org/tii/content/events/f_macarth.html . With a
population under 2 million, Kuwait has about 120 births per day, or 6 for
each of its score of hospitals. Premature newborns, who sometimes need
incubators, account for only about one in nine births. For hundreds of
incubators, you want a hen hatchery, not a hospital. To quell such doubts,
Hillton & Knowles PR followed up with false witnesses to the burial of the
dead babies, see <http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/3589/us-iraq-lie.html>http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/3589/us-iraq-lie.html
. Apparently no one has been sued for the genocidal consequences.
[3] The use of the term "CIA" as shorthand for a covert, corrupt criminal
clique working within it, should not detract from the fact that most of the
men and women of the CIA may do valuable, and occasionally even
courageously conscientious work. They also serve to mask the "skunk works,"
which is banned under the CIA's charter.
[4] "Gabriel Hanotaux, The Dreyfus Affair, and How London Orchestrated
the Destruction of the Franco- German Alliance," also corroborates
England's horror at economic development for Egypt, sees France and Germany
as builders, England as looter
<http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac/hanot91.htm>http://members.tripod.com/~american_almanac/hanot91.htm
[5] Martin Palmer, <http://www.nex.net.au/users/reidgck/DIVIDE.HTM>http://www.nex.net.au/users/reidgck/DIVIDE.HTM
[6] In "A New Age of Empire,"
<http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=11&ItemID=2610>http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=11&ItemID=2610
Dedication:
Courage is the Desire to Seek the Truth, Whatever It May Be;
Patriotism is the Courage to Speak the Truth, In the Face of Tyranny
Keynote quotation: "War is not an answer to human conflict any more than
cannibalism is to human hunger." - Bruce Kent
At 05:49 6.2.03 -0800, you wrote:
>Interesting how they used Powell's good cop versus bad
>cop over the life of this administration, and know its
>time to cash in -- Khaldoun
>
>"If you torture data enough, it will finally
>confess!!"
>
>Robert Fisk, "Powell Presentation: It was like
>something out of Beckett"
>
><http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=40&ItemID=2977>ht tp://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=40&ItemID=2977
>
>Sources, foreign intelligence sources, "our sources,"
>defectors, sources, sources, sources. Colin Powell's
>terror talk to the United Nations Security Council
>yesterday sounded like one of those
>government-inspired reports on the front page of The
>New York Times where it will most certainly be
>treated with due reverence in this morning's edition.
>It was a bit like heating up old soup. Haven't we
>heard most of this stuff before? Should one trust the
>man? General Powell, I mean, not Saddam.
>
|
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |