< < <
Date Index > > > |
Taliban, Pakistan and US by Karl Carlile 18 October 2001 05:09 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
Pakistan has been seeking to extend its regional power base in Central Asia. The attack on Afghanistan by US/UK imperialism constitutes a response to this Pakistani colonialism. Without Pakistan's support there would have been no Taliban regime in Afghanistan. Pakistan's strategy is the extension of its influence, even control, over Afghanistan by ensuring that a compliant force, the Taliban, is in power. In this way Pakistan would have significantly extended its strategic influence within central Asia. This strategic advantage would have been of geopolitical and commercial significance. Under these conditions Pakistan would have significant influence over the fuel and other resources in Afghanistan. Its influence, even colonisation, of Afghanistan would have strengthened its position concerning its relationship with India over the Kashmir question. An expanded Pakistan would be better placed to further extend its influence over the entire Central Asian region. This would provide Pakistan with immeasurable political and commercial power. This would mean its increased influence over the surrounding countries. Perhaps even the further colonialist expansion of Pakistan beyond Afghanistan into neighbouring Tajikistan and Uzbekistan. The Pakistani bourgeoisie hoped to realise these imperialist ambitions through the exploitation of Islamic fundamentalism. Through the exploitation of Islamic fundamentalism it hoped to create a Pakistan that extended its tentacles into all of Central Asia --an Islamic Central Asian state or federation. The realisation of this ambition would have better placed it to proceed to the colonisation of Kashmir. It is these ambitions that constitute the greatest danger to the Indian state. Consequently India utilises Kashmir as a political device to thwart Pakistani ambitions. However the Taliban have been proving to be less than fully compliant. The Taliban government has been proving a growing concern for Pakistan. The Taliban even entertain ambitions of its own that are not entirely congruent with Pakistani ambitions. Given this state of affairs the US/UK attack on Afghanistan is essentially an attack on Pakistan. It is the expansionist Pakistani state that US/UK imperialism is seeking to contain. US/UK imperialism cannot tolerate the emergence of a Pakistani regional power in Central Asia possessing increasingly significant geo-political and economic power. Musharraf has been cleverly exploiting the domestic unrest in Pakistan provoked by Western intervention in Afghanistan to pressurise US imperialism into accepting the installation of a new regime in Afghanistan acceptable to Pakistan in the aftermath of the expected fall of the Taliban. If Pakistan is getting its way, and it looks like it is, this means that Washington has been expending considerable resources in an attack on the Taliban regime of which the end result will be a new Afghani regime more compliant to Pakistan while possessing greater international credibility. In a sense, then, the US will have undertaken a politically delicate intervention to further the interests of Pakistan while weakening its own imperialist interests. If this turns out to be the case then the terrorist attack on New York and Washington will have had its desired effect. It will have provoked an over-reaction from the Bush administration leading to the weakening rather than the strengthening of US imperialism. However this will intensify capitalist contradictions that will make the global situation potentially more explosive. Rather than its military intervention leading to the defeat of Islamic fundamentalism it may lead to its growth. The result in the long run, among other things, will be more terrorist activity. Clearly the terrorist attack on New York and Washington and the character of Bush's reaction to it is an expression of the weakness of US imperialism. Under these conditions the attack on Pakistan, through its attack on Afghanistan, will have played right into the hands of Pakistan. Obviously the situation is very delicate. One misconceived move by Pakistan could see its entire strategy collapse like a house of cards. This is particularly true because of the unstable political, social and economic conditions that obtain in Pakistan. The recent Musharraf coup d'etat together with Pakistan's expansionist strategy are confirmation of this instability. Regards Karl Carlile (Communist Global Group) Be free to join our communism mailing list at http://homepage.eircom.net/~kampf/
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |