< < <
Date Index
> > >
Re: Inevitability Theses
by CJR
09 August 2001 00:09 UTC
< < <
Thread Index
> > >
I never said there was a strictly logical proof. I said that the
respondent could not logically refute my arguments.

The empirical proof is that every mass society has access to luxury
goods, and luxury goods are distributed in such a way as to favor a
given class of people. Therefore, we have at least two classes in every
mass society: those that consume luxury goods, and those that have no
access to them.

Can you grasp this concept? Jeez, it can't be that hard.

I know accepting the facts is always hard.

//CJR

-----Original Message-----
From: wsn-owner@csf.colorado.edu [mailto:wsn-owner@csf.colorado.edu]On
Behalf Of Austin, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 4:46 PM
To: 'wsn@csf.colorado.edu'
Subject: Inevitability Theses



What is the logical proof that there must inevitably be social classes?
I am
unfamiliar with it, but very interested in hearing it.

Andrew Austin
Green Bay, WI


< < <
Date Index
> > >
World Systems Network List Archives
at CSF
Subscribe to World Systems Network < < <
Thread Index
> > >