< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: Inevitability Theses by CJR 09 August 2001 00:09 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
I never said there was a strictly logical proof. I said that the respondent could not logically refute my arguments. The empirical proof is that every mass society has access to luxury goods, and luxury goods are distributed in such a way as to favor a given class of people. Therefore, we have at least two classes in every mass society: those that consume luxury goods, and those that have no access to them. Can you grasp this concept? Jeez, it can't be that hard. I know accepting the facts is always hard. //CJR -----Original Message----- From: wsn-owner@csf.colorado.edu [mailto:wsn-owner@csf.colorado.edu]On Behalf Of Austin, Andrew Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 4:46 PM To: 'wsn@csf.colorado.edu' Subject: Inevitability Theses What is the logical proof that there must inevitably be social classes? I am unfamiliar with it, but very interested in hearing it. Andrew Austin Green Bay, WI
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |