Re: Hardt on Charlie Rose

Elson,

Can you provide a clear example of what you mean by saying that "such
criticisms of Hardt and Negri are dogmatic"?  Perhaps also, your
definition of "dogmatic" would be helpful as well.

thanks,

colin
 _______________________________________
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Elson Boles wrote:

> I just slightly disagree with Steve about the list.  It is not so much that
> it regularly suffers from nonsensical jargon, and myopia as well, but that
> certain contributors do.  In the course of the dialogue we have discovered
> that Hardt and Negri are judged not to be good Marxists and have not said
> and done what Marx allegedly would have said and done.  Well good for them;
> for it is also clear that such criticisms of Hardt and Negri are dogmatic,
> and that brings us back to Boris' criticism of Proyect of 7-8-01.  In
> contrast, the discussion between Steve and Boris is usually quite
> interesting.  I hope it continues.