< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: Quebec wall down! by jon 21 April 2001 21:08 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
In response to Loomis' comment, I fully agree. I find Jones' comment to be rather pretentious and thoroughly privileged. Further, I don't see how these protests can be divorced from "scholarly" world systems discourse and analysis. It seems to me that they make up an integral (and equally compelling--for those concerned with analysis) part of the larger and ongoing discourse within the world system. ----- Original Message ----- From: Erik Loomis <eloomis20@hotmail.com> To: <InvictusCapPart@aol.com>; <p34d3611@jhu.edu> Cc: <wsn@csf.colorado.edu> Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 3:50 PM Subject: Re: Quebec wall down! > Comments like the one I am replying to are precisely why activists don't > look to academics for leadership in their struggles. > > Erik Loomis > University of New Mexico > > > >From: InvictusCapPart@aol.com > >To: p34d3611@jhu.edu > >CC: wsn@csf.colorado.edu > >Subject: Re: Quebec wall down! > >Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 10:19:52 EDT > > > >What does this exchange have to do with a scholarly discourse about world > >systems? Please find a "protest network" on which to gloat about the Quebec > >Wall, and preserve WSN for discussion of the study of world systems! > > > >Thanks & regards, > > > >Milo Jones > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com >
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |