< < <
Date Index
> > >
Re: Quebec wall down!
by jon
21 April 2001 21:08 UTC
< < <
Thread Index
> > >
In response to Loomis' comment, I fully agree. I find Jones' comment to be
rather pretentious and thoroughly privileged. Further, I don't see how these
protests can be divorced from "scholarly" world systems discourse and
analysis.  It seems to me that they make up an integral (and equally
compelling--for those concerned with analysis) part of the larger and
ongoing discourse within the world system.


----- Original Message -----
From: Erik Loomis <eloomis20@hotmail.com>
To: <InvictusCapPart@aol.com>; <p34d3611@jhu.edu>
Cc: <wsn@csf.colorado.edu>
Sent: Saturday, April 21, 2001 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: Quebec wall down!


> Comments like the one I am replying to are precisely why activists don't
> look to academics for leadership in their struggles.
>
> Erik Loomis
> University of New Mexico
>
>
> >From: InvictusCapPart@aol.com
> >To: p34d3611@jhu.edu
> >CC: wsn@csf.colorado.edu
> >Subject: Re: Quebec wall down!
> >Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 10:19:52 EDT
> >
> >What does this exchange have to do with a scholarly discourse about world
> >systems? Please find a "protest network" on which to gloat about the
Quebec
> >Wall, and preserve WSN for discussion of the study of world systems!
> >
> >Thanks & regards,
> >
> >Milo Jones
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>


< < <
Date Index
> > >
World Systems Network List Archives
at CSF
Subscribe to World Systems Network < < <
Thread Index
> > >