< < <
Date Index > > > |
new york times confessions by Richard N Hutchinson 18 January 2001 23:43 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
One of my favorite categories is when the hegemonic press confesses something you've been saying all along. Here are 4 recent examples from the New York Times that you can quote to amaze your students, colleagues, and friends: 1) 12/28/00 "Economic Engine for Foreign Policy" -David Sanger "The Asian crisis confirmed what many developing nations had suspected: globalization was a rich country's game, and the rules were rigged to favor the most competitive. The free-market system let the United States ship its goods, open its factories, and move capital anywhere it wanted. But poorer nations often found that their products could not compete and that their low-tech exports were suject to tariffs and quotas that American, European and Japanese industries would not eliminate. So when the United States proposed a further opening of world markets, developing nations struck back, starting at Seattle in late November 1999." I think that one speaks for itself. 2) 12/28/00 "China at Gate of Profound Shift" -Craig S. Smith "...[N]ew rules are allowing privately owned companies access to the country's capital markets, which so far have been effectively off limits for nearly all of them..." "The change also has political implications: as China's ranks of private businesses grow in number and wealth, their owners will become an increasingly powerful constituency whose demands the government will not be able to easily ignore." Amazing! The growth of a powerful capitalist class is portrayed as excellent in China, but in the U.S. we're still supposed to believe the civics class fairy tale that says the government is a democracy based on "one person, one vote." But there it is, once there is a large, wealthy capitalist class, the government can't easily ignore their demands. I guess we live in a plutocracy after all! 3) 12/28/00 "For All Russia, Biological Clock Is Running Out" -Michael Wines "The twin trends -- rising deaths and declining births -- are both rooted in the social and public-health upheavals that have swept the nation since the Soviet Union entered its death throes in 1991. Both trends have confounded experts, who expected them to be neither as serious or as prolonged as they have been. The country's health care has collapsed in the last decade, along with the people's health. Public hospitals and clinics are short of money and medicine; doctors earn near-poverty wages; infectious diseases like tuberculosis are epidemic." This article, on the plummeting birth rate, is part of a series on the health and demographic catastrophe in the former Soviet Union. So much for life getting better after the fall of "communism"! 4) 11/26/00 "Who Really Brought Down Milosevic? -Roger Cohen Here's the subhead: "Student activists, backed by American money and training, undermined the dictator and his brutal henchman with a clever campaign of nonviolence" The article reveals National Endowment for Democracy and AID funding for Otpor, a youth group that means "Resistance." It also says: "American assistance to Otpor and the 18 parties that ultimately ousted Milosevic is still a highly sensitive subject." "Otpor leaders intimate they also received a lot of covert aid -- a subject on which there is no comment in Washington." "By this fall, Otpor was no ramshackle students' group; it was a well-oiled movement backed by several million dollars from the United States." I am no supporter of Milosevic (my mind can easily grasp the possibility that the regime *AND* U.S./NATO intervention were wrong), but this is very revealing of the U.S. effort to overthrow a regime it saw/sees as an obstacle to its dream of unchecked capital. Alright, thank you for clarifying these issues for us, New York Times. Richard Hutchinson Weber State University Ogden, Utah
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |