Re: Kosovo and DU

I agree with Alan here. As usual, Michael Puglisie comes up with conspiracy
theories of the kind  the United  States government and NATO subscribe.

For what had really happened in Yugoslavia &  NATO directed war against
Yugoslavian people, I recommend the  list members to have a look at Jared
Israel's Boston based magazine _Emperor's Clothes_. There are objective articles
there by Michael Chouvodovsky (?)  and other progressives who concern themselves
with US imperialism in Yugo,  rather than with NATO based stories.

Mine

Alan Spector wrote:

> But do you agree that Clinton-Gore should be brought up on War Crimes
> charges for what they have done to the Iraqi people?
>
> ===================================
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Pugliese" <debsian@pacbell.net>
> To: <wsn@csf.colorado.edu>
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 11:23 AM
> Subject: Re: Kosovo and DU
>
> > For Alan and others...IWPR does great work. Check out the Chechnya and
> > Balkans Update lists there too. Now that B. Plavsic is on trial, I
> suspexct
> > that the former Bosnian Serb leadership around madman Karazdic is next.
> And
> > if y'all are gonna beat this dead horse about how many Kosovatrs were
> killed
> > how come no one on the hard left brings up the 200,000 killed (mostly
> > Bosnian Muslims and Croats by the Serb neo-fascists with a Red-Brown
> tinge
> > ala Milosevic et. al.) during the Bosnian cinflict from the early 90's.
> That
> > is the foreground of the later slaughter by Milosevic et. al.
> >                                         Michael Pugliese, just another
> > petty-boorrrjjjwwaaah liberal intelectual (with a just above minimum wage
> > job so I'm not sure about my P.B. class location, heh...)
> >
> >
> > TRIBUNAL UPDATE 202
> >
> > Last Week in The Hague (December 4-9, 2000)
> >
> > GENERAL KRSTIC TRIAL  - Defence witness claims Mladic's intervention
> spared
> > Srebrenica an even worse fate
> >
> > KORDIC & CERKEZ TRIAL - Final witnesses called to the stand as trial draws
> > to a close
> >
> > TUTA AND STELA CASE - Defendant pleads not guilty to amended charges
> >
> > CROATIAN PAPERS RISK CONTEMPT CHARGES -  Croatian newspapers warned
> against
> > publishing protected witness statements
> >
> > Tribunal Update is written by IWPR senior editor Mirko Klarin, a leading
> > Hague court correspondent, and Vjera Bogati.
> >
> > ****************** VISIT IWPR ON-LINE: www.iwpr.net **********
> >
> > GENERAL KRSTIC TRIAL  -  Defence witness claims Mladic's intervention
> spared
> > Srebrenica an even worse fate
> >
> > The bloodshed in Srebrenica would have been "much worse" but for the
> > intervention of General Ratko Mladic, a defence witness in the Krstic
> trial
> > claimed last week.
> >
> > Yugoslav army general Radovan Radinovic, appearing as a military expert
> for
> > the defence, said the former Bosnian Serb army, VRS, commander altered an
> > order from the entity's president Radovan Karadzic demanding the
> > 'elimination' of the United Nations protected area.
> >
> > General Radislav Krstic, former commander of the VRS Drina Corps, is
> charged
> > with genocide for his alleged role in the Srebrenica massacres, which
> > claimed the lives of  at least 7,500 Bosnian Muslim men and boys. Krstic's
> > defence team claim Mladic had taken over control of the Srebrenica
> operation
> > from the defendant before the killings started.
> >
> > Radinovic faced a difficult task disputing the analysis of prosecution
> > military experts, United States military intelligence analyst Richard
> Butler
> > and British Major General Richard Dannett (see Tribunal Updates Nos. 182,
> > 185 and 186).
> >
> > The witness served as a senior officer in the former Yugoslav People's
> Army
> > and its successor, the Yugoslav army. He taught at military colleges and,
> > during the Bosnian war, served as an advisor to ex federal president
> Dobrica
> > Cosic, a vocal advocate of Serbian nationalism.
> >
> > Radinovic began by challenging Butler and Dannett's claim that the
> > Srebrenica operation - code named Krivaja 95 - was well-planned, complex
> and
> > precisely executed. He also disputed the presence of an effective chain of
> > command, with Krstic at its head.
> >
> > The witness said Krivaja 95 was "not a big military operation". He
> described
> > the battle as "small in scope and of low intensity". Progress was slow,
> > "with small losses on both sides and a very small degree of destruction."
> >
> > The aims, according to Radinovic, were to "prevent subversive terrorist
> > incursions by members of the 28th Division [of the Bosnia-Herzegovina
> Army],
> > which violated the protected zone", to sever links between the Muslim
> > enclaves of Srebrenica and Zepa, and to reduce the size of the enclave.
> >
> > These goals were achieved on July 9, 1995, Radinovic said, when units from
> > the Drina Corps took up their planned positions on high ground around
> > Srebrenica.
> >
> > Then "a crazy plan to capture Srebrenica crossed someone's mind," the
> > witness said.
> >
> > Radinovic said the decision to press on into Srebrenica was made by
> > Karadzic, who as president of Bosnian Serbs was also supreme commander of
> > the armed forces. Radinovic's conclusion was based on an order sent to the
> > Drina Corps forward command post on July 9, 1995, which read "the
> President
> > of the Republic approves the continuation of the attack and the entry of
> the
> > VRS into Srebrenica."
> >
> > Radinovic veers off at this point from the defence's basic argument that
> > Mladic had ordered the capture of Srebrenica and had taken over command of
> > the operation from Krstic.
> >
> > But the witness did attribute responsibility for the crimes to the
> > politicians and the police, who were under the control of the Bosnian Serb
> > government.
> >
> > Due to the "balance of forces" between the VRS and the BiH Army's 28th
> > Division, no soldier had considered capturing Srebrenica, Radinovic said.
> He
> > claimed BiH troops outnumbered the Bosnian Serb forces by almost 3 to 1.
> >
> > "Military doctrine," Radinovic said, dictated "attackers must
> significantly
> > outnumber defenders" in order to capture a town.
> >
> > That Srebrenica did fall, on July 11, 1995, was due more to the failings
> of
> > the 28th Division and the BiH Army's supreme command. The international
> > community was also partly responsible, he said.
> >
> > The 28th Division failed to defend the town effectively even though it had
> > sufficient manpower and arms to hold out "long enough for the
> international
> > community to get involved," Radinovic said.
> >
> > A decisive defence of the town would have forced the UN mechanism to act,
> > Radinovic argued. He said the international community's decision not to
> take
> > any action was "irresponsible".
> >
> > Radinovic said blame rested not only with the Dutch UN Protection Force
> > Battalion in Srebrenica, but also with the then High Representative Carl
> > Bildt, UN Representative Yasushi Akashi and the commander of UN forces in
> > Bosnia, British General Rupert Smith.
> >
> > Had these officials come to Srebrenica on July 11 and 12, 1995, the
> > 'consequences' of the town's capture could have been avoided, Radinovic
> > said.
> >
> > Radinovic did not deny the mass execution of prisoners of war, but said
> most
> > of the casualties were the result of heavy fighting between Drina corps
> > units and troops of the 28th BiH Army division, which were trying to break
> > through to Tuzla.
> >
> > "The intensity of the fighting was so great," Radinovic said, "it is
> > realistic to express the losses in the thousands, rather than hundreds."
> >
> > He criticised VRS headquarters for failing to "register properly" where
> BiH
> > Army soldiers were buried. Radinovic said those BiH officers responsible
> for
> > the decision to try and break through VRS lines must have realised what
> the
> > likely consequences would be and that they had in effect "sacrificed the
> > 28th Division."
> >
> > That the bulk of the Drina Corps was involved in an operation near Zepa
> was
> > "lucky", Radinovic said, otherwise the losses experienced by those trying
> to
> > get to Tuzla "would have been even graver."
> >
> > Radinovic faced three and half days of cross-examination by prosecutors
> last
> > week. British Major Andrew Caley led the prosecution's questioning.
> >
> > Caley immediately homed in on the directive from Karadzic, issued in June
> > 1995. Radinovic described the directive as a "list of desirable aims" and
> > not as a binding order governing military operations.
> >
> > In the directive, Karadzic called for "daily planned and thought out
> combat
> > operations" to create "conditions and total insecurity, intolerability and
> > make impossible the further survival of life of the inhabitants in
> > Srebrenica and Zepa."
> >
> > Under pressure from the judges, Radinovic was forced to agree with the
> > prosecutor this was a directive "to eliminate the Srebrenica enclave."
> >
> > But Radinovic insisted Mladic, in his order (directive 7.1), had changed
> the
> > Karadzic directive, deliberately replacing the phrase "elimination of
> > Srebrenica" with "active military actions around the enclave" because he
> > understood all too well what Karadzic's order could lead to.
> >
> > "It was good that he did," said Radinovic, "because the consequences would
> > have been much worse."
> >
> >
> > KORDIC & CERKEZ TRIAL - Final witnesses called to the stand as trial draws
> > to a close
> >
> > The trial of Dario Kordic and Mario Cerkez, accused of crimes against
> > Bosniak (Bosnian Muslim) civilians in central Bosnia, is finally drawing
> to
> > a close.
> >
> > Final witnesses in the 19-month long case were called last week and
> closing
> > arguments from the prosecution and defence counsels are scheduled for
> > December 14 and 15.
> >
> > The final prosecution witness was Halid Genjac, a member of the
> > Bosnia-Herzegovina tripartite presidency. During the Bosnian war, Genjac
> was
> > president of the Bosniak Muslim Party of Democratic Action, SDA, in
> Travnik.
> >
> > "From the beginning, the HDZ [Croatian Democratic Union] obstructed
> > municipal political life," Genjac said. "That ended in complete blockade."
> >
> > In 1992, he said, "a kind of ultimatum" was issued demanding Bosniaks join
> > the Croatian Defence Force, or HVO. "We stressed recognition of the HVO
> > government would be unconstitutional. The government in Travnik could not
> be
> > named after only one people."
> >
> > According to Genjac, the only legal institutions in the town were the
> > municipal presidency and the executive board.
> >
> > Kordic, as former vice-president of the so-called Croatian Community of
> > Herceg-Bosna and of the HDZ in Bosnia-Herzegovina, is charged with making
> > the most important political decisions in central Bosnia.
> >
> > The defence claim Kordic exercised no political power. Genjac, however,
> said
> > the local Croatian leadership in Travnik "asked or quoted Kordic."
> >
> > Last week, the judges also accepted as evidence several documents gleaned
> > from Croatian archives.
> >
> > Of the large volume of material submitted by the prosecution, only 16
> > documents were accepted by the judges as meeting their strict criteria for
> > the admission of new evidence at such a late stage in proceedings.
> >
> > The documents - HVO reports, orders and the logbook of the HVO central
> > Bosnia command - were deemed "sufficiently significant" for their adoption
> > at such a late stage in the trial.
> >
> > At this stage, it is difficult to assess the new evidence presented
> because
> > not all the exhibits were read out in public and some of the prosecution's
> > witnesses did not testify in open court.
> >
> > The new evidence includes allegations concerning Kordic's participation at
> a
> > meeting of central Bosnia political and military leaders in Vitez on April
> > 15, 1993 - the eve of the Lasva valley HVO offensive.
> >
> > It is alleged those at the meeting laid down plans for the attacks against
> > Bosniaks the following day.
> >
> > Kordic's defence team called three witnesses, HVO political and military
> > officials, to testify that the accused was not present at the meeting and
> > that they also knew nothing of it.
> >
> > Cerkez's lawyers focused on evidence implicating the accused in organising
> > the attack on Ahmici on April 16, 1993, which left over 100 Bosniak
> > civilians dead.
> >
> > The defence argued that reports sent by Cerkez, then commander of the HVO
> > Vitez brigade, to his superiors about the "advances of the HVO forces on
> > Ahmici" did not imply the defendant knew of or had responsibility for the
> > massacre in the village.
> >
> >
> > TUTA AND STELA CASE - Defendant pleads not guilty to amended charges
> >
> > Mladen "Tuta" Naletilic and Vinko "Stela" Martinovic pleaded not guilty
> last
> > week to amended charges concerning their alleged abuse of prisoners.
> >
> > The two men were accused of forcing prisoners to carry out dangerous
> > military tasks such as transporting ammunition across front lines and
> > drawing enemy fire.
> >
> > The charges constitute violations of the laws or customs of war and -
> > following an amendment to the indictment relating to "dangerous and
> > humiliating labour" - grave breaches of the Geneva Convention.
> >
> > Naletilic, former commander of the Convicts' Battalion, and Martinovic,
> > former commander of the battalion's anti-terrorist unit, are accused of
> > persecuting Bosniaks (Bosnian Muslims) in and around Mostar in 1993 and
> > early 1994.
> >
> > The prosecution claims the defendants were responsible for attacks on
> > civilians, illegal detention of civilians and of inhuman treatment of
> > prisoners under their control. They are also charged with murder, the
> forced
> > expulsion of people and theft.
> >
> > Martinovic and Naletilic pleaded not guilty to all the original charges
> > during their initial hearings shortly after their arrival at The Hague.
> > Croatia extradited Martinovic in August 1999 and Naletilic in March 2000.
> >
> > Trial preparations are still underway. Pre-trial judge Patricia Wald has
> > asked the prosecution to reduce the number of witnesses it plans to call
> to
> > between 50 and 60 and for the prosecution and defence to aim to present
> > their respective cases within ten weeks.
> >
> > One unresolved pre-hearing issue is the prosecution's intention to include
> > as material evidence affidavits from witnesses scheduled to be interviewed
> > by representatives from the prosecutor's office.
> >
> > Martinovic is demanding to be present when the witnesses give their
> > statements, because he argues this would contribute to their accuracy and
> > reliability.
> >
> > The start date for the trial has yet to be set. "What we can say now is
> that
> > this chamber will tell both sides some time in March when this trial will
> > begin," presiding judge Almiro Rodrigues said.
> >
> > The three trial judges have said on several occasions the cases could be
> > heard by a different trial chamber due to their already pressing workload
> > with the Srebrenica and Omarska hearings. Given the recent announcement of
> > 27 additional temporary judges for the tribunal, a change of chamber looks
> > even more likely.
> >
> >
> > CROATIAN PAPERS RISK CONTEMPT CHARGES - Croatian newspapers warned against
> > publishing protected witness statements
> >
> > Two Croatian newspapers, the weekly Globus and the daily paper Slobodna
> > Dalmacija, could face contempt of court charges following their
> publication
> > of statements by Croatian President Stipe Mesic during a closed tribunal
> > hearing in 1998.
> >
> > The statements were given by Mesic in April 1998 during the trial of
> former
> > Bosnian Croat commander Tihomir Blaskic. Mesic was given protected status
> > and allowed to give evidence in a closed session.
> >
> > On December 1, the tribunal judges which originally heard the Blaskic
> case,
> > issued an order requesting the Croatian papers stop publishing statements
> by
> > protected witnesses. The order warned, "any publication of these
> statements
> > and testimonies shall expose its authors and those responsible to be found
> > in contempt of the tribunal."
> >
> > The court also asked the Croatian authorities to take steps to halt
> further
> > publication of the statements.
> >
> > But on December 6, Slobodna Dalmacija published another transcript from a
> > closed court session involving the Croatian president. In his introduction
> > to the story, the newspaper's editor- in-chief, Josip Jovic, said he had
> > disregarded the Tribunal's order because "there is an understandable
> public
> > interest in The Hague testimony of the current head of state."
> >
> > "The institution of keeping secrets does not apply to newspapers," Jovic
> > added.
> >
> > The tribunal has yet to react to the Slobodna Dalmacija article.
> >
> > Tribunal spokesman Jim Landale said publication of protected material was
> > "foolish and irresponsible". He reiterated the publication of such
> material
> > could constitute contempt of court. "It is up to the trial chamber to take
> > what measures it thinks necessary," Landale said, adding this could
> include
> > summoning a person to The Hague to respond to contempt of court charges.
> >
> > On December 7, the Croatian government said it had no information on how
> the
> > newspapers got hold of Mesic's testimony. It said the government did not
> > have cited minutes of Mesic's court appearance and did not know who the
> > sources of such disclosures could be.
> >
> > Immediately after Mesic appeared at The Hague, material relating to his
> > testimony leaked to the Croatian press. The reappearance of stories two
> > years on, and well into Mesic's presidency, suggests the revelations have
> > more to do with Croatian domestic politics than anything else.
> >
> > Criticism in Croatia that the Tribunal court order amounted to
> "censorship"
> > and "interference with the freedom of the media" met short shrift from
> > prosecutor's office spokeswoman Florence Hartmann.
> >
> > "Publishing information given to the Tribunal through testimonies is not a
> > problem - their content will be known to the public through the court
> > sentences in any case," Hartmann said. "But the problem is when a witness
> > who gave them is identified because that will affect the readiness of
> other
> > witnesses to make a statement before the Tribunal."
> >
> > "The publication of protected witnesses' names only makes it harder for
> > prosecutors to collect information on crimes, and hence in establishing
> the
> > truth and administering justice."
> >
> > ****************** VISIT IWPR ON-LINE: www.iwpr.net*********
> >
> > These weekly reports, produced since 1995, detail events and issues at the
> > International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The
> > Hague, providing an independent and comprehensive account of the war
> crimes
> > process.
> >
> > Copyright (c) 2000 The Institute for War & Peace Reporting.
> >
> > Tribunal Update is produced under IWPR's Tribunal Monitoring Project. The
> > project seeks to contribute to regional and international understanding of
> > the war-crimes prosecution process.
> >
> > IWPR gratefully acknowledges the Swedish International Development Agency
> > and the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office for support for this project,
> as
> > w ell as general support from the Ford Foundation.
> >
> > Articles are available, with permission, for free republication within the
> > region.
> >
> > The Institute for War & Peace Reporting (IWPR) is a London-based
> independent
> > non-profit organisation supporting regional media and democratic change.
> >
> > Lancaster House, 33 Islington High Street, London N1 9LH, United Kingdom
> > Tel: (44 171) 713 7130 Fax: (44 171) 713 7140  E-mail info@iwpr.net
> >
> > For further information on this project and other reporting services and
> > media programmes, as well as details for subscribing and unsubscribing,
> > visit IWPR's Website: <www.iwpr.net>.
> >
> > Editor-in-Chief: Anthony Borden. Managing Editor: Yigal Chazan. Associate
> > Editor: Gordana Igric. Assistant Editors: Alan Davis and Heather Milner.
> > Editorial Assistant: Mirna Jancic. Kosovo Project Manager: Llazar Semini.
> > Translation: Alban Mitrushi and others.
> >
> > The opinions expressed in "Tribunal Update" are those of the authors and
> do
> > not necessarily represent those of the publication or of IWPR.`
> >
> > IWPR'S TRIBUNAL UPDATE, NO. 202
> >
> >
> >
> > {#} ----------------------------------------------------+[
> trienglish ]+---
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Alan Spector <spectors@netnitco.net>
> > To: WORLD SYSTEMS NETWORK <wsn@csf.colorado.edu>
> > Date: Monday, January 15, 2001 9:05 AM
> > Subject: Re: Kosovo and DU
> >
> >
> > >Immediately just before the NATO bombing on Yugoslavia began, the reports
> > >were that 2,000 Kosovar Albanians had been murdered over the past two
> years
> > >and that as many as 50,000, perhaps even 100,000 were about to be
> murdered.
> > >After the bombing, there was a massive forced displacement of Kosovar
> > >Albanians, including the murders of an unknown number.  Despite the best
> > >efforts of U.S. technology, including FBI forensic experts, satellite
> > >photos, etc, current estimates of bodies found range between 600 and
> 2,000,
> > >and some of them might be Serbian victims.  Somewhere between 500 and
> 1500
> > >Yugoslavians were killed as a direct result of the NATO bombing, and it
> is
> > >difficult to estimate how many more deaths will result from the
> > consequences
> > >of bombing roads and bridges, which doubtless has caused more deaths as
> > >people in critical situations may be unable to get quick medical care.
> > >
> > >About the two years prior to the bombing and the initial US/NATO
> rationale
> > >of two thousand murders -- Kosovo has about 2 million people. Two
> thousand
> > >constitutes a murder rate of one/thousand, over two years.  Gary, Indiana
> > >which adjoins my city of Hammond, has about 100,000 people and
> > approximately
> > >one hundred murders per year, or about one/thousand over one year. Gary
> has
> > >twice the murder rate that Kosovo had.
> > >
> > >But that was enough of an excuse for US/NATO which was carrying on the
> > older
> > >imperial British strategy of destabilizing regions to keep them weak and
> > >vulnerable, without actually having to physically occupy them.
> > >
> > >It is true that some Serb military forces did commit war crimes. No doubt
> > >there were individual soldiers, even perhaps some high ranking military
> > >officers who approved the execution of civilians. But nothing like the
> > >ridiculous lies we were fed about 25,000 or 50,000. And if "depleted
> > >uranium" does cause cancer among civilians, if various other actions such
> > as
> > >bombing chemical plants caused civilian deaths, then the charge of "war
> > >crimes" must be applied to the US/NATO effort. And all this pales in
> > >comparison to the massive civilian deaths caused by the US led embargo
> > >against the Iraqi people, and of course the Vietnam War. And how come
> > people
> > >are developing amnesia about the massive civilian deaths the U.S.
> military
> > >caused in Vietnam, as well as destabilizing the rest of Southeast Asia
> and
> > >laying the basis for many more outside Vietnam?  Why are people who
> condemn
> > >imperialism considered "fringe" or "hysterical"?  Because the mainstream
> > >liberal intellectuals serve their masters by lying outright in propaganda
> > >service to these mass murderers. And no, that's not exaggeration.
> > >
> > >Alan Spector
> > >
> > >
> > >Alan Spector
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: <franka@fiu.edu>
> > >To: <wwagar@binghamton.edu>
> > >Cc: <wsn@csf.colorado.edu>
> > >Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 7:23 PM
> > >Subject: Re: Kosovo and DU
> > >
> > >
> > >> everything warren says is right - except the second sentence.
> > >> there is no evidence of any such campaign, and the NATO/Brit "defense'
> > >> minister-now NATO head's, claim of 10,000 then 100,000 Albian massacred
> > at
> > >> Serb hands has turned out by Nato and other forenscic teams to have
> been
> > >> less  than 2,000 - far too many but far fewer  than necessary to whip
> up
> > >> popular support for the NATO mission = to expand eastward, and of the
> > >> 2,000 many were Albanian combatants and others probably were also
> > >> Serbs. And as to the alleged Serb plan that Warren refers to,
> > >> 1. the Germans invented an alleged such plan, which was then shown to
> be
> > a
> > >> hoax, even in leaked German foreing ministry reports and [all another
> > >> Tonkin Gulf and incubator babies in Kuwait]
> > >> 2. many Albanians fled into Serbia - from NATO!
> > >>
> > >> to beOn Sun, 14 Jan 2001 wwagar@binghamton.edu wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 19:37:08 -0500 (EST)
> > >> > From: wwagar@binghamton.edu
> > >> > To: wsn@csf.colorado.edu
> > >> > Subject: Kosovo and DU
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > The well-deserved flap about DU should not obscure the fundamental
> > >> > evil involved in the U.S./NATO rampage against Serbia.  I do not
> doubt
> > >> > that Serbia had in mind a campaign that would drive many ethnic
> > >Albanians
> > >> > over the border, with ethnic Albanian casualties in the process pour
> > >> > encourager les autres.  The U.S. once engaged in "Indian wars" to
> > effect
> > >> > the same result.  Be that as it may.
> > >> >
> > >> > The real point is that the United States and its "allies"
> > >> > intervened in the affairs of a Balkan republic in the hope of
> teaching
> > a
> > >> > lesson, to wit:  do not adjust your television sets, we are in
> control,
> > >> > and we will bomb into submission anybody who resists us.  If it helps
> > us
> > >> > to demolish your tanks by resorting to nuclear weapons, so be it.  We
> > >are
> > >> > above the law, if law there be, and we will use our technology to
> slice
> > >> > you to ribbons.  Should any civilians on the ground die in the
> process,
> > >so
> > >> > much the worse for them!  We're not trying to save them, anyway,
> we're
> > >> > trying to assert our hegemony.  Should any of our precious
> peacekeepers
> > >> > die in the process, well, we never promised them a rose garden.
> > >Besides,
> > >> > they're not us!  They're expendable, right?
> > >> >
> > >> > Of course the ultimate jest is the "D" in "DU."  The uranium is
> > >> > depleted for any serious use in weapons or energy production, but if
> it
> > >> > remains radioactive for several millennia, hey, that's life!  Or
> > >> > half-life.  Or death. ...
> > >> >
> > >> > Yours in disgust,
> > >> >
> > >> > Warren
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >>
> > >>                  ANDRE  GUNDER  FRANK
> > >>
> > >>          1601 SW  83rd Avenue, Miami, FL.  33155 USA
> > >>       Tel: 1-305-266  0311   Fax:  1-305  266 0799
> > >>              E-Mail :  franka@fiu.edu
> > >>    Web/Home Page:  http://csf.colorado.edu/archive/agfrank
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >

--
Mine Aysen Doyran
Ph.D Student
Department of Political Science
SUNY at Albany
Nelson A. Rockefeller College
135 Western Ave.; Milne 102
Albany, NY 12222



Shop online without a credit card
http://www.rocketcash.com
RocketCash, a NetZero subsidiary