< < <
Date Index > > > |
[Fwd: LOW INTENSITY NUCLEAR WAR, Part One] by Mine Aysen Doyran 16 January 2001 18:54 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
The URL for this article is http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/choss/dep.htm For a printable version, click here. www.tenc.net [Emperor's Clothes] LOW INTENSITY NUCLEAR WAR, Part One By Michel Chossudovsky [1-16-2001] Professor of Economics, University of Ottawa, author of "The Globalization of Poverty", second enlarged edition, Common Courage Press, 2001. INTRODUCTION The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) are attempting to convey the illusion, contrary to scientific evidence, that the health risks of depleted uranium in Kosovo can easily be dealt with by cordoning off and "cleaning up" the "targeted areas". What they fail to mention is that the radioactive dust has already spread beyond the 72 "identified target sites" in Kosovo. Most villages and cities, including Pristina, Prizren and Pec, lie within less than 20 km. of these sites, confirming that the whole province is contaminated, putting not only "peacekeepers" but the entire civilian population at risk. The nature and dangers of Depleted Uranium were well known to NATO leaders prior to the 1999 bombing of Yugoslavia. Therefore this bombing is best described as a "low intensity nuclear war" using toxic radioactive shells and missiles. Amply documented, the radioactive fall-out potentially puts millions of people at risk throughout the Balkans. UN/NATO Statement: "The effects of DU are mainly localized in the places DU has been used and the affected areas are likely to be small". 15 (From preliminary UNEP study on effects of DU contamination in Kosovo. Three members of this UN mission belong to military outfits with close ties to NATO). Independent Expert's Statement: "When used in war, the depleted uranium (DU) bursts into flame [and] releasing a deadly radioactive aerosol of uranium, unlike anything seen before. It can kill everyone in a tank. This ceramic aerosol is much lighter than uranium dust. It can travel in air tens of kilometres from the point of release, or be stirred up in dust and re-suspended in air with wind or human movement. It is very small and can be breathed in by anyone: a baby, pregnant woman, the elderly, the sick. This radioactive ceramic can stay deep in the lungs for years, irradiating the tissue with powerful alpha particles within about a 30 micron sphere, causing emphysema and/or fibrosis. The ceramic can also be swallowed and do damage to the gastrointestinal tract. In time, it penetrates the lung tissue and enters into the blood stream. …It can also initiate cancer or promote cancers which have been initiated by other carcinogens". 25 (World renowned radiologist Dr. Rosalie Bertell) - MC, January 16, 2001 Low Intensity Nuclear War by Michel Chossudovsky The death from leukemia of eight Italian peacekeepers stationed in Bosnia and Kosovo sparked an uproar in the Italian Parliament, following the leaking of a secret military document to the Italian newspaper La Republicca. In Portugal, the Defense Ministry was also involved in what amounted to a deliberate camouflage of the cause of death of Portuguese peacekeeper Corporal Hugo Paulino. "Citing 'herpes of the brain', the army refused to allow his family to commission a postmortem examination."1 Amidst mounting political pressure, Defense Minister Julio Castro Caldas advised NATO Headquarters in November that he was withdrawing Portuguese troops from Kosovo: "They were not, he said, going to become uranium meat". 2 As the number of cancer cases among Balkans "peacekeepers" rises, NATO's cover-up has started to fracture. Several European governments have been obliged to publicly acknowledge the "alleged health risks" of depleted uranium (DU) shells used by the US Air Force in NATO's 78-day war against Yugoslavia. The Western media points to an apparent split within the military alliance. In fact there was no division or disagreement between Washington and its European allies until the scandal broke through the gilded surface. Italy, Portugal, France and Belgium were fully aware that DU weapons were being used. The health impacts -- including mountains of scientific reports -- were known and available to European governments. Italy participated in scheduling the flights of A-10 anti-tank attack planes, also known as Warthogs, carrying DU shells, out of its Aviano and Gioia del Colle air force bases. The Italian Defense Ministry knew what was happening at military bases under its jurisdiction. Washington's European partners in NATO including Britain, France, Turkey, Greece have DU weapons in their arsenals. Canada is one of the main suppliers of depleted uranium. NATO countries share full responsibility for the use of weapons banned by the Geneva and Hague conventions and the 1945 Nuremberg Charter on war crimes. 3 Since the Gulf War, Washington launched a cover-up of the health impacts of DU toxic radiation known as the "Gulf War Syndrome", with the tacit endorsement of its NATO partners. While NATO had until recently denied using DU shells in the 1999 war against Yugoslavia, it now admits that although it did use DU ammunition, the shells "have negligible radioactivity…and [a]ny resulting debris posing any significant risk dissipates soon after the impact." 4 While casually denying "any connection between illness and exposure to depleted uranium", the Pentagon nonetheless concedes -- in an ambiguous statement -- that "the main danger posed by depleted uranium occurs if it is inhaled." 5 And who inhales the radioactive dust, which has spread across the land? The shrouded statements from European governments convey the uncomfortable illusion that only peacekeepers "might be at risk", i.e. that radioactive particles are only inhaled by military personnel and expatriate civilians, as if nobody else in the Balkans was affected. The impacts on local civilians are not mentioned. In docile complicity, a new media consensus has unfolded: the mainstream press concurs without further scrutiny that only "peace-keepers" breathe the air. "But what about everybody else?"6 In Kosovo some 2 million civilian men, women and children have been exposed to this radioactive fallout since the beginning of the bombing in March 1999. In the Balkans, more than 20 million people are potentially at risk: "The risk in Kosovo and elsewhere in the Balkans is augmented by the uncertainty of where DU was dropped in whatever form and what winds and surface water movements spread it further. Working the fields, walking about, just being there, touching objects, breathing and drinking water are all risky. A British expert predicted that thousands of people in the Balkans will get sick of DU. The radioactive and toxic DU-oxides don't disintegrate. They are practically permanent." 7 Keep in mind that the heavily armed "peacekeepers" together with United Nations staff and civilian personnel of "humanitarian" organisations entered Kosovo in June 1999. The spread of radioactive dust from DU, however, started on day one of the 78 day bombing of Yugoslavia. With the exception of NATO Special Forces -- who were assisting the KLA on the ground -- NATO military personnel was not present on the battlefield. In other words, there was no radioactive exposure to NATO troops during a push-button air war, which Alliance forces waged from the high skies. Yugoslav civilians are, therefore, at much greater risk because they were exposed to radioactive fallout throughout the bombings as well in the wake of the war. Yet the official communiqués suggest that only KFOR troops and expatriate civilians "might be at risk" implying that local civilians simply do not matter. Only servicemen and expatriate personnel have been screened for radiation levels. CHILDHOOD CANCERS The first signs of the effects of radiation poisoning on children, including herpes on the mouth and skin rashes on the back and ankles, have been observed in Kosovo.8 In Northern Kosovo -- the area least affected by DU shells (see Map at http://balkans.unep.ch/du/targetmap.html ) -- 160 people are being treated for cancer, especially cancer of the uterus.9 The number of leukemia cases in Northern Kosovo has increased by 200 percent since NATO's air campaign with a similar increase in children born with deformities.10 This information regarding civilian victims -- which the United Nations Mission in Kosovo (UNMIK) has been careful not to reveal -- refutes NATO's main "assumption" that radioactive dust does not spread beyond the target sites, most of which are in the Southwestern and Southern regions close to the Albanian and Macedonian borders. These findings are consistent with those from Iraq, where the use of depleted uranium weapons during the 1991 Gulf War resulted in "increases in childhood cancers and leukemia, Hodgkin's disease, lymphomas, and increases in congenital diseases and deformities in fetuses, along with limb reductional abnormalities and increases in genetic abnormalities throughout Iraq."11 Pedriatic examinations on Iraqi children confirm that: "Childhood leukemia has risen 600% in the areas [of Iraq] where DU was used. Stillbirths, births or abortion of fetuses with monstrous abnormalities, and other cancers in children born since [the Gulf War in] 1991 have also been found." 12 COVER-UP The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have tacitly accepted NATO-Pentagon assumptions concerning the health impacts of depleted uranium. When UNEP conducted its first assessment of DU radiation in Kosovo in 1999, NATO refused to provide the mission with maps indicating the locations of "affected areas" (points of impact where DU shells had fallen). On the pretext that "there was insufficient data available to comprehensively address the issue of the impacts of depleted uranium ordnance," UNEP produced an inconclusive and noncommittal "desk study" which was appended to the 1999 Balkans Task Force Report (BTF) on the environmental impacts of the War. 13 UNEP's desk study pointed to the "possible use of DU" thereby implying that it was still unsure as to whether DU shells had actually been used. UNEP's evasiveness -- claiming lack of sufficient data -- contributed, in the wake of the bombings, to temporarily dissipating public concern. More generally, the UNEP-UNCHS Balkans Task Force report tends to downplay the seriousness of the environmental catastrophe triggered by NATO. Amply documented, the catastrophe was the deliberate result of military planning.14 NATO maps (indicating where DU shells had been targeted) were not required for UNEP and the WHO to conduct an investigation on the health impacts of depleted uranium radiation. A study of this nature -- inevitably requiring a team of medical specialists in pediatrics and cancer working in liaison with experts on toxic radiation -- was never carried out. In fact, UNEP's stated "scientific" assumption precluded from the outset a meaningful assessment of the health impacts. According to UNEP: "The effects of DU are mainly localized in the places DU has been used and the affected areas are likely to be small". 15 See the 1999 desk study, op. cit.) This proposition (which is presented without scientific proof) is shared by UNEP's sister organization, the WHO: "You would have to be very close to a damaged tank and be there within seconds of it being hit…These soldiers were very unlikely to have been exposed.'' 16 These statements by UN bodies (quoted by NATO and the Pentagon to justify the use of DU weapons) are part and parcel of the camouflage. They convey the illusion that the health risks to peacekeepers and local civilians can easily be dealt with by cordoning off and "cleaning up" the "targeted areas." The WHO has warned, in this regard, that depleted uranium could affect children playing in these areas "because children… tend to pick up pieces of dirt or put their toys in their mouth."17 What the WHO fails to acknowledge is that the radioactive dust has already spread beyond the affected areas, suggesting that children throughout Kosovo are at risk. This tacit complicity of specialized agencies of the UN is yet another symptom of the deterioration of the United Nations system, which now plays an underhand role in covering up NATO war crimes. Since the Gulf War, the WHO has been instrumental in blocking a meaningful investigation of the health impacts of depleted uranium radiation on Iraqi children, claiming "it had no data to conduct an in-depth investigation" 18 UNEP AND NATO WORKING HAND IN GLOVE Amidst the public outcry and mounting evidence of cancer among Balkans military personnel, UNEP conducted a second assessment in November 2000 which included field measurements of beta and gamma particle radiations in 11 so-called "affected areas" of Kosovo.19 Despite NATO's earlier refusal to collaborate with UNEP, the two organizations are currently working hand in glove. The composition of the mission was established in consultation with NATO. The representative from Greenpeace (involved in the 1999 study) had been dumped. NATO maps were made readily available; the investigation was to focus narrowly on the collection of soil, water samples, etc. in 11 selected sites ("affected areas") out of a total of some 72 sites within Kosovo (see NATO map at http://balkans.unep.ch/du/targetmap.html ). The broader health issues were not part of the mission's field of study. The two medical researchers dispatched by the WHO in 1999 (as part of the desk study mission) were now replaced with experts from the US Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (see http://chppm-www.apgea.army.mil/default.htm ) and AC Laboratorium Spiez (ACLS), a division of the Swiss Defense Procurement Agency. AC Laboratorium Spiez (ACLS) has actively collaborated in chemical weapons inspections in Iraq. Under the disguise of Swiss neutrality, ACLS constitutes an informal mouthpiece for NATO. ACLS has been on contract with NATO's "Partnership for Peace" (PfP) financed by the Swiss government's contribution to the PfP.20 Although the November mission was still under UNEP auspices, the Swiss government funded most of the fieldwork with ACLS -- a division of the Swiss military -- playing a central role. The mission -- integrated by representatives linked to the Military establishment -- was working on the premise (amply reviewed on ACLS's web page) that DU radioactive dust does not (under any circumstances) travel beyond the "point of release." 21 The results of the report, to be published in March 2001, are a foregone conclusion. They focus on radiation levels in the immediate vicinity of the target sites . According to the mission's "back to office report" (January 2001): "… [A]lready at this stage the Team can conclude that at some of the DU locations, the radiation level is slightly higher above normal at very limited spots. It would therefore be an unnecessary risk to the population to be in direct contact with any remnants of DU ammunition or with the spots where these have been found." 22
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |