< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
RE: [PEN-L:5702] NACLA and Colombia
by John Enyang
12 December 2000 16:48 UTC
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Paul Broome wrote:
> >
> > >
> >Paul,
> >So, taking your argument a tiny step further, I presume we (humans) are
> >all bourgeois and (or) postmodernist now. This being the case, someone
> >really ought to announce it to those persistently revolting masses in the
> >third world.
> >John Enyang,
>
> John
>
> Probably I mistook your use of the word 'revolt' for 'revolution'.
> While it is true many citizens around the world are involved in many
> types of social disobedience or revolt, I think hardly any of them
> constitute a revolution. The fact that people do not revolt does not
> make them a member of the bourgeoisie - the fact they are not
> revolting does not mean they own either the means of their
> production, or the control of their ideas.
>
> BTW, I wish people would drop the term 'Third World' - it is no
> longer politically or anylitically correct and people in the South
> generally find it a derogatory term, as they do 'developing country'.
>
> Comradely, Paul.
>
>
Paul,
It's too early to come to a definitive judgement on the medium and long
term impact of today's social and political struggles. That said, I think
these struggles are both necessary and deserving of support.
Regards,
John Enyang,
MSCS (M/C 249)
SEO 322 / 851 S. Morgan Street,
Chicago, IL 60607-7045,
USA.
enyang@math.uic.edu
http://www.math.uic.edu/~enyang
< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
|
Home