Re: philosophical/theoretic explanation

In a message dated 00-12-04 23:00:28 EST, richard@cyberjournal.org writes:

> Dear Ismail,
>  
>  Oh... your posting _did go to the list.  My mistake.
>  
>  I found your comments very interesting and I hope others
>  comment.
>  

Oooof!

Why do I have to be working on a bloody technical project on this machine at 
this time of the night?

I also find Ismail' s comments interesting but not for the reasons you may 
have in mind. What do you have in mind by the way?

I could have made some similar comments myself although I am more optimistic 
about an anti-capitalist, that is, socialist, revolution than Ismail. 
Revolution is not something that we will be able to start and finish in one 
day. It has been and will be a very long process, and maybe I will not see 
that better world myself. Let me tell you that it is not the certainty but 
the possibility of revolution that I still hold dear. You see, future is just 
a path dependent probability distribution and the draw we will make from this 
distribution will depend on what we do now.

Again! What are you trying to accomplish Richard? Or am I being too tolerant?

Sabri