< < < Date > > > | < < < Thread > > >

Values Study and Spiral Dynamics

by Alan Webster

19 June 2000 04:38 UTC


Dear Network
I've been following the discussions with great interest and have found various contributions highly informative. I'm in catch-up mode in that, whilst being engaged in the World Values Survey, in particular as director of the New Zealand series, I am not a specialist on World Systems. So I fear that my comments would usually be too much on the intuitive level, whereas most WSN members are obviously teachers and researchers deeply versed in retrieving and generating fast-moving information and ideas.
This sounds as if I'm a spectator, and so I am, but I'm immersed in the write-up of our latest survey. We put out a small book in November, 1999 (Paul Perry and Alan Webster, 1999, New Zealand Politics at the turn of the Millennium : Attitudes and Values About Politics and Government, Alpha Publications. pb 103pp. Distributors, Addenda: PO Box 78224, Grey Lynn, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ph/Fax 64 09 834 5511. Email: addenda@xtra.co.nz)
This book and survey accurately tapped the near revolution in voter-values following a decade of unrelenting free-market ideology with all of the run-down of social services through a scandalous privatization agenda. New Zealand went from being a wonder of the world in its swing to right-wing economics to a very decisive voter rejection. The key issue was the effects of the policies on the wellbeing of the poorer sector of society among whom the indigenous Maori and the immigrant Pacific Islanders are far over-represented. The new Labour government has espoused 'Third Way' economics, which to some of us is a short-term moderate populism that will meet difficulties in the form of the underlying individualistic materialism of the Labour voters, not to mention the back-lash of the business sector. However, Helen Clark is riding high and great mates with Tony Blair.
 
My main reason for writing is to say I am well on with writing a more complete book from the study. I am inspired in part by the Chase-Dunn and Boswell book, which I like very much, but also by the Spiral Dynamics model of Clare Graves, developed further by Don Beck and Chris Cowan. I propose to use the 'levels of culture' that they base upon an evolutionary-developmental principle, as a framework for our empirical structure of values. There is a match between our value-factors and the Spiral levels, and these in turn are associated with Ethnic National Identities and with Class and Education Level. Since the Spiral Dynamics model aspires to being a world model in which the spiral is created by the interaction of individual needs and conditions of existence it has occurred to me that WSN people may know of it have opinions about it.
I should be very grateful for any responses and I suppose, with some trepidation, I need to know whether people have negative criticisms of the model. More correctly, I'm sure there are criticisms, some of which would follow from the initially psychologistic starting point. After all, it is really a needs theory married to conditions of existence - and strongly endorsed, may I say, by Ken Wilber. I'm reasonably happy with all that, but my experience of 30 years as a psychologist and human developmentalist teaching in a social sciences faculty in which a powerful role was played by critical sociology has led me to try to be integral. 
Alan Webster   
 

< < < Date > > > | < < < Thread > > > | Home