< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
Labour on the Fence
by md7148
21 May 2000 07:16 UTC
http://www.allnewspapers.com/middeast/
Al-Ahram Weekly
> 11 - 17 May 2000
> Issue No. 481
> Labour on the fence
> By Fatemah Farag
> "My brothers, the workers:
> From the first day in the 23 July, 1952 Revolution, it was
> clear that this
> revolution was undertaken for the working people, for
> dissolving differences
> between classes, for establishing social justice, for the
> establishment of a healthy
>
democratic life, for abolishing feudalism, for abolishing the
> monopoly and
> control of capital over government and for abolishing
> colonialism."
Gamal Abdel-Nasser, May Day Speech, 1963
>
> With these words the late President Gamal Abdel-Nasser summed up,
> in his first-ever May
> Day speech, the revolutionary ilan of his era. It is a spirit whose
> time has now passed.
> Although some of the rhetoric once used to espouse the merits of
> his socialist experiment
> remain within the lexicon of the Egypt of today, the context is
> much changed. The dynamics
> of capitalist development have considerably altered the economic
> landscape. The
> relationship between the state and labour is governed by a new
>agenda
he populist regime of Nasser considered the working class to be a
> corner stone within the
> "Alliance of Popular Working Forces" in the struggle to achieve
> economic independence
> and build an Arab brand of socialism. Wage improvements, job
> security measures and
> social benefits were implemented as part of a greater national
> project. Workers' status as social actors was
> enshrined in a new constitution that guaranteed that 50 per cent of
> parliament would be held by "workers and
> peasants."
In the 1963 May Day speech quoted above, Nasser, in reference to
> the sweeping nationalisations of two years
> before declared, "In 1961, the worker became the boss.; in 1961,
> the worker participated in administration; in
> 1961, the worker shared in profits; in 1961, work hours were
> reduced to seven hours; in 1961, the minimum wage
> was set at 25 piastres; in 1961, the real benefits of the workers
> began." Yet, Nasser's Arab Socialism was a social
> contract and as with all contracts, gains come at a cost. In return
> for greater benefits the labour movement gave up
> its independence. The government-controlled General Federation of
> Trade Unions (GFTU) and the Ministry of
> Manpower became the guardians of labour rights.
>
> However, these were the heady
> days of state-driven industrialisation,
> public sector expansion and
> guaranteed employment. In a few short
> years, this economic framework
> quickly reached the limits of its
> potential. Since the
> mid-seventies, the country has been moving to a
> more laissez-faire model of
> development. In 1992, the government
> adopted a programme of
> structural adjustment that consummated the
> ideological and economic policy
> shift. Today, liberal free market
> economic policies are espoused
> with the same intensity of conviction
> that had once characterised the
> drive to build socialism.
>
Last week, in an interview with
> the Al-Ahram Weekly, the Minister of
> Manpower and Immigration, Ahmed
> El-Amawi, explained that the
> liberalisation process has meant
> more jobs for workers. In the new
> satellite industrial cities and
> within the private sector in general, he
> estimates that 200,000 jobs were
> created last year alone. He also
> praised the vitality of the
> informal sector, which had created an
> estimated eight million jobs.
>
> Yet, the quality of jobs as well
> as the rate of growth vis-`-vis
> unemployment are still serious
> concerns. While the dominant opinion
> holds that the populist
> instruments of the past are still adequate, labour
> grievances, and struggles on the
> ground seem to be testing the limits of
> this argument.
>
Yet, the quality of jobs as well
> as the rate of growth vis-`-vis
> unemployment are still serious
> concerns. While the dominant opinion
> holds that the populist
> instruments of the past are still adequate, labour
> grievances, and struggles on the
> ground seem to be testing the limits of
> this argument.
>
> Debate on the current state of
> labour in Egypt focuses on the issue of
> unemployment. The government
> claims it currently stands at about
> eight per cent. This figure,
> however, has been contested by a number
> of independent studies which
> generally put it around 17 per cent.
> Nader El-Fergani, head of the
> independent Almishkat Center for
> Social Studies, explained to the
> Weekly that this discrepancy is due to
> the fact the "standard
> definition of unemployment, ratified by
> international conventions, is
> not used by the government when
> calculating their current
> estimate." El-Fergani pointed out that, "In
> 1996, the Central Authority for
> Mobilisation and Statistics
> (CAPMAS) figure was 22 per cent!
> I think that the new figures are a
> result of the fact that the
> issue of unemployment has become very
> politicised and there is a need
> to manipulate the figure."
In a recent study of the main
> labour market aggregates and rates in
> Egypt between 1988 and 1998,
> Ragui Assaad, professor at the
> Humphries Institute of Public
> Affairs, University of Minnesota, found
> that of those entering the job
> market, only one out of every three
> entrants found a job. A large percentage of these jobs were to be
> found within the government sector itself. In the
> private sector, Assaad discovered that most of the newly employed
> were not sufficiently protected by current
> legislation. In the study, he found that 80 per cent of these
> workers enjoyed no labour protection.
>
> Perhaps the most poignant indicator of the pressures created by the
> growing pool of unemployed is the size of the
> informal labour market. So-called "men's markets" can be found all
> over urban centres. Men congregate in these
> areas to be picked up by contractors in need of menial day labour.
> Other indicators of deep unemployment are the
> mass of internal migrants, the expansion of the informal sector and
> the climate of fear that seems to prevail among
> workers who have succeeded in landing jobs. As one worker in the
> industrial 10th of Ramadan City put it, "The
> owner of my factory has the upper hand. I need this job. If I say
> anything to protest work conditions, well then, he
> can throw me out and find ten to replace me on the same day. After
> all, we all know that there are a lot of people
> who desperately need a job."
>
Chronic unemployment is only one half of the labour dilemma,
> however. The other major problem is endemic
> poverty. Fergany explained to the Weekly, "One of the most telling
> pieces of information is that labour's share in
> national income dropped from 44 per cent in 1975 to 25 per cent in
> 1995. Wealth has become polarised and in this
> situation the poor, in reality, do not count within the system.
> Don't believe otherwise."
>
> Mahmoud Mortada, former trade union activist and current labour
> issues researcher, is another scholar attempting to
> raise awareness of the deterioration in the labour market. He
> explains that, "workers have suffered a decrease in
> their standard of living as a result of the state withdrawing from
> many basic services. The development of the new
> industrial cities has created a section of the working class which
> is totally isolated, and the informal sector provides
> jobs where protection is non-existent, and working conditions are
> harsh. The net result is that workers feel they have
> been thrown on the market without the protection of either the
> state or their own organisations, which creates a
> strong feeling of fear."
>
> Even senior trade union officials, while supporting the overall
> direction of economic policy, concede that labour is,
> for the time being, at a distinct disadvantage within the new
> economic environment. "The new capital is in many cases
> ferocious," confided a senior GFTU official who requested
> anonymity, who went on to explain that "there are many
> cases of inhumane capital/labour relations in which the aim of
> capital is to make a quick profit and take advantage of
> incentives given to investment. Yet, these incentives were made in
> order for capital to create good jobs. In such
> cases, capital has not come through with its part of the deal."
>
A case in point is the plight of 300 workers at El-Motahida factory
> in 10th of Ramadan City. "The owner of the
> factory borrowed LE23 million from the banks without proper
> insurance and in September he fled. Since then
> workers have not been paid," explained Abdel-Hakim Amer, head of
> the factory trade union committee.
>
> Arriving in this much heralded archetype of the new industrial
> cities one is impressed by the wide tree-lined roads
> and well maintained gardens. Venturing further in, however, the
> green spaces recede and the road gets bumpy.
> When we finally reached the El-Motahida plant, the city was a
> dismal sight.
>
> Within the gates, which are guarded half-heartedly by a few
> policemen, workers have converted burlap bags into
> tents. In order to protect their jobs, they have not left the
> premises since the first of February. Amer explained that,
> "We presented a detailed plan of how to work the factory
> profitably," showing us neatly hand-written sheets of
> paper covered in figures. "We have gone to [Manpower Minister]
> El-Amawi and to Sayed Rashed [head of
> GFTU]. So far it seems there is nothing they can do for us. Also,
> our appeal to have the government take
> custodianship of the factory was thrown out of court on 30 April,"
> he recounted. Refusing to accept defeat, Amer
> added adamantly, "We will, however, appeal this court decision and
> we will not move from our factory until we have
> been paid in full and our jobs are back."
>
> Workers gathered around us as we speak nod their heads in sullen
> agreement. The situation at the El-Motahida
> factory is not unique in this city. Amer informs us that, "As far
> as we know there are 28 factories which shut down
> the same way. Workers would leave Thursday evening only to come
> back Saturday morning and find a lock on the
> door. They had no rights and there was nothing they could do about
> it. They had no union committees. Fortunately,
> we are one of the very few that do, which is why we were able to
> take action."
>
> It is estimated that out of the 1,200 factories in 10th of Ramadan
> a mere 17 have trade union committees. A GFTU
> source who requested anonymity explained to the Weekly that factory
> owners prohibited workers from organising.
> The official explained, "To deal with this problem we have started
> setting up informal committees, but outside the
> work place. Of course, more must be done." Yet, the prospects for
> movement in this direction are not promising.
> The GFTU itself introduced regulations, some years ago, which
> increased the number of required applicants to
> create a trade union committee from 50 to 250, which further
> complicated organisation efforts.
>
> The workers of El-Motahida recount that many of their colleagues in
> other factories are required to sign a resignation
> form -- 'form number six' -- before being hired. Such insecurity is
> the cost of higher wages. "Of course we are lured
> to the new cities because the money offered is better. In similar
> industries within the traditional industrial areas, the
> salaries offered are a third to a half less than here. In 10th of
> Ramadan an average salary is no less than LE250. But
> for many of the workers here, you have to sign yourself over to the
> will of the owner before you can get a job,"
> muttered one of the workers.
>
> The new cities, however, are only one aspect of the changing labour
> market. Another crucial dynamic is the heavy
> cuts being made to the size of the public sector. "To date 135,000
> workers have been removed from their jobs via
> the early retirement scheme," explained Hassan Badawi, a spokesman
> for the leftist Tagammu' Party on labour
> issues. "That is not counting tens of thousands of workers who have
> lost their jobs as a result of the closure of certain
> factories, such as the case of the General Company for Batteries,
> and the de facto factory shut downs, such as the
> Misr Helwan Spinning and Weaving Factory. Furthermore, as far as
> the traditional private sector goes the past year
> has seen the mass closure of medium- and small-sized aluminum
> factories in Mit Ghamr and textiles factories in
> Shubra Al-Kheima. In these cases because legislation is set up in
> favour of large capital, owners could not keep up."
>
> GFTU and the Ministry of Manpower and Immigration have argued that
> the formulation of more balanced
> labour-capital relations can be achieved if the controversial draft
> Unified Labour Law is passed. The draft has
> already been in the making for about five years. Drawn up through
> consultation with representatives of labour,
> business and the International Labour Organisation (ILO), a final
> version has yet to see the full light of day. Last May
> Day was in fact an opportunity for both Minister El-Amawi and
> GFTU's Rashed, to call on President Hosni
> Mubarak to expedite the passing of the proposed legislation. A GFTU
> source told the Weekly that some
> businessmen were against the draft law because it was in their
> benefit to keep workers in a state of legal limbo. Even
> on the side of labour there is some trepidation regarding the
> possible impact of the new legislation. There are many in
> the labour movement who fear that the proposed draft will only work
> against their interests.
>
> But even more pressing than the pros and cons of the proposed new
> legislation seems to be the fact that labour laws,
> whatever they may be, are inadequately enforced. In the idle
> factory grounds of El-Motahida, workers complained
> that the fine for delayed or even non-payment of salaries was a
> paltry LE10 a month per worker. Amer lamented,
> "Even if the official at the Labour Office is conscientious, the
> sum is so small that owners don't care. The interest
> made in the bank by the total sum of our salaries in one month
> would cover the fine and then some. Then, of course,
> there is the problem of Labour Office employees who are responsible
> for inspection. These have more to gain from
> the owners than they have to gain from the workers, and what
> happens as a result is self-evident."
>
> But what about labour activism. Detailed studies are few and far
> between. A report issued by the Land Centre for
> Human Rights, an NGO, documented 164 incidents of labour protest
> during 1999. Tagammu's Badawi explains,
> however, that labour activism remains disjointed and defensive.
> Labour at the moment does not have the
> organisational power to effect change, argues Badawi who goes on to
> suggest that the time has come for new forms
> of labour organisation to meet the requirements of the new economic
> reality. He notes that, "The current trade union
> structure represents three million workers out of over 17 million,
> and as the public sector is broken up so is the base
> of the GFTU."
>
> Similarly, Mortada argues that although GFTU has promoted a model
> of labour-capital relations based on
> negotiation, it does not have the abilities to undertake the role.
> "How can we talk about negotiations in the absence
> of independent shop-floor organisations?" questioned Mortada.
>
> Badawi believes that he can outline a new labour regime to which
> most independent activists would agree. "Before
> we can talk of laws or a balanced relationship between labour and
> capital I think that the freedom to form trade
> unions must be provided without restrictions, as well as the right
> to strike. In this aspect, workers should have equal
> rights to businessmen who not only enjoy full freedom of
> association but can close down whenever they please.
> General policies must be geared to reduce unemployment which
> continually pressures labour into accepting
> wretched working conditions while both social and health insurance
> must be upgraded and re-structured in ways
> which would provide real services to workers."
>
> The debate on labour legislation, trade union organisation and
> employment policy is unlikely to reach conclusive
> results any time soon. Meanwhile, the workers of the El-Motahida
> continue their indefinite sit-in on the grounds of
> their defunct company. Their concerns are at once pressing and
> far-reaching. In the words of their leader, Amer,
> "We want to have a future, something to look forward to. So far,
> that 'something' is very unclear."
>
> --
>
> Mine Aysen Doyran
> PhD Student
> Department of Political Science
> SUNY at Albany
> Nelson A. Rockefeller College
> 135 Western Ave.; Milne 102
> Albany, NY 12222
--
Mine Aysen Doyran
PhD Student
Department of Political Science
SUNY at Albany
Nelson A. Rockefeller College
135 Western Ave.; Milne 102
Albany, NY 12222
< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
|
Home