< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
Re: Capital is wrong (fwd)
by Andrew Wayne Austin
10 March 2000 03:53 UTC
I would tend to agree with this except that George's point was a
methodological one.
Andy
On Thu, 9 Mar 2000, Carl Dassbach wrote:
>I've noticed that the same topics keep appearing on discussion lists every
>few months but with different sets of discussants. "Capital/Marx" is wrong
>is a good example.
>
>As I have already written, quoting the Lukacs' essay "What is Orthodox
>Marxism" - it is immaterial and unimportant is Capital is "right or wrong"
>-
>this is a scholastic debate on the order of debating how many angels can
>fit
>on the head of a pin.
>
>What is important is that the "method discovered by Marx" historical and
>dialectical materialism be used to refine, broaden and deepen our
>understanding of the world, that this knoweldge becomes the basis for
>activity or practice and that our knoweldge is modified based upon the
>outcomes or consequences of our activity/practice(the latter two points
>are,
>of course, the Marxian theory of praxis (as ennuciated in the Theses on
>Feurbach.)
>
>
< < <
Date > > >
|
< < <
Thread > > >
|
Home