On Mon, 27 Jul 1998, Mark Jones wrote:
> Dawkins isn't a reactionary, altho Zhirinovsky perhaps is (actually he's
> a stooge of the neoliberal west, therefore not the Black Hundred he
> seems, ie, he's a diffrent kind of libertarian reactionary). But are you
> saying that one ought not to talk to people one disgrees with?
I could care less who you have dinner with, Mark. What I am questioning is
the relevance of your dinner with Dawkins to the matter that your claim
was exposed as completely vacuous. Actually, I am not even questioning the
relevance of your personal encounter; having dinner with sociobiologists
doesn't bear on anything we have been discussing.
Andy