11/18/97, Andrew Wayne Austin wrote:
>I wrote a longer post to you, but my server crashed. In short, it said you
>are not explaining the world. (And it suggested you read Gill, Cox, and
>Robinson.)
Come on Andrew, join in the discussion -- what haven't I explained, and
what did those esteemed gentlemen say that is relevant to this thread?
I didn't understand your allusion to "Weberian thought experiments", but my
"inquiry" posting hopefully addresses the issues you had in mind.
rkm