by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.0-7 #13870)
id <01I7PYXC8N009GVND0@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu>; Wed,
31 Jul 1996 11:27:55 -0400 (EDT)
by jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu (PMDF V5.0-7 #13870)
id <01I7PYX0KGZI9GVL2B@jhmail.hcf.jhu.edu>; Wed,
31 Jul 1996 11:27:40 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 11:30:30 -0700
From: chris chase-dunn <chriscd@jhu.edu>
Subject: Re: the world party
To: ROZOV@cnit.nsu.ru
Organization: Johns Hopkins Department of Sociology
References: <59CF579F6@cnit.nsu.ru>
Nikolai Rosov suggests:
> Why not to discuss multi-polar partnership with monopoly for legitime
>military operations based on accepting global legal standards? I would
>not even argue against the leading role of US in this partnership, but
>such political, military, economic forces of EU, Japan, Russia, China,
>India, Brasilia, South Africa, maybe Turkey, Egypt, and Iran (as leaders
>of correspondent geopolitical regions) should be necessarely presented
>in this partnership.
ok. lets call it a multipolar partnership, not a world state. fine. how
can we make this happen?
chris
chris