< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: NYTimes.com Article: Iraqi Family Ties Complicate American Efforts for Change by Charles Jannuzi 30 September 2003 03:05 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
FYI: 1. Consanguineous marriage and/or breeding is very common, even in societies where people tend not to be so aware of it--including the US, where the laws attempt to prevent marriage of first cousins of reproductive age. Consanguineous marriage and/or breeding of some sort might be related to things like lines of descent and inheritance of property, but it also can reflect the isolation of a minority--such as the gypsies or triracial isolates in the Appalachians--or the desire to remain distinct, such as with the Amish. 2. Consanguineous marriage of patrilateral first cousins is reported to be quite common in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Jordan; you could even say a dominant pattern to marriage in those countries. It's reported as common among Kurds, even higher than among Shia in other places in the ME. For Iraq, however, the official information I've got is that it is, overall, lower there than for much of the other Arab world (S.A., Kuwait, Jordan). For example, http://208.48.48.190/Publications/EMRO%20PUB-TPS-GEN-PRT2-CHPT5-5.2.HTM 3. It's a topic Stanley Kurtz at National Review has latched on to, so beware. NR, NYT, it makes little difference to me. It appears earliest as one of those 'trends in analysis' pieces here in this American Conservative article. The wretchedness of the NYT knows no limits now apparently. In fact, the hard facts that the NYT article cites appears to come straight out of this piece of trash: "Cousin Marriage Conundrum: The ancient practice discourages democratic nation-building" by Steve Sailer The American Conservative, Jan. 13, 2003, pp. 20-22 (not online) snip snip>>Many prominent neoconservatives are calling on America not only to conquer Iraq (and perhaps more Muslim nations after that), but also to rebuild Iraqi society in order to jumpstart the democratization of the Middle East. Yet, Americans know so little about the Middle East that few of us are even aware of one of one of the building blocks of Arab Muslim cultures -- cousin marriage. Not surprisingly, we are almost utterly innocent of any understanding of how much the high degree of inbreeding in Iraq could interfere with our nation building ambitions.<<snip snip wash hands. 5. Other reading (recommended) http://www.genesage.com/professionals/geneletter/archives/issue2/kissingcousins.html Middle East (especially Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and Jordan) Over half of all marriages are consanguineous.The most common type of consanguineous marriage is that of patrilateral first-cousins. Syria, Israel (Arab community), Algeria, Lebanon, Egypt, Pakistan More than one in four marriages are consanguineous [so far, the information that I've found puts Iraq more in line with these countries, and if you subtract the Kurds, the % goes down - CJ] http://www.consang.net/global_prevalence/tables/Minorities.pdf http://www.emro.who.int/Publications/EMHJ/0202/19.htm While a-thalassaemia has never been a health problem in Iraq, b-thalassaemia in its homozygous state is [5]. It is the authors' opinion that the high prevalence rate of heterozygous b-thalassaemia, and that of consanguineous marriages in the community, in addition to high morbidity and mortality rates, and the heavy burden imposed on the health services in association with homozygous thalassaemia, should prompt the health authorities to establish an effective prenatal diagnostic programme. Such a programme could only be possible by initiating research programmes to determine the molecular pathology of this type of thalassaemia in Iraq. Moreover, further studies to estimate the prevalence of thalassaemia in other regions of the country, utilizing a similar approach as in the current study, is of prime importance in order to establish a comprehensive national programme to combat this important health problem. http://208.48.48.190/Publications/EMRO%20PUB-TPS-GEN-PRT2-CHPT5-5.2.HTM 5.2 Frequency and types of consanguineous marriage The term consanguineous literally means related by blood, so consanguineous marriages are defined as marriages between blood relatives. For practical purposes, geneticists usually classify unions between second cousins or closer as consanguineous, because the genetic risk for less closely related couples differs only marginally from that in non-consanguineous unions. Consanguineous marriage is strongly favoured in many large human populations. Figure 5.1 is based on 98 local, regional, and national studies conducted during the last two generations, sample size varying from 252 to 893 941 [121,148]. In the mainly Muslim countries of the Eastern Mediterranean Region, and in most parts of south Asia, consanguineous marriage accounts for from 20% to over 50% of the total in the present generation. No account has been taken of major populations (e.g. of China and Indonesia) for which there is little current information on prevalence of consanguineous marriage, although anthropological sources indicate that first cousin marriage used to be traditional in at least a part of the population [149]. The numerically significant communities of Asian or African origin now resident in Western Europe, North America and Oceania are also omitted. In 1994, the combined population of countries where consanguineous marriage is known to be customary was 732 million, and a further 1468 million live in countries where 1% to 10% of marriages are consanguineous. The specific types of consanguineous marriage favoured can vary quite widely between and within countries, and religious and cultural factors play a major part in determining social attitudes and legal frameworks at local and national levels. For example, in Lebanon consanguineous marriages are reported to be more prevalent within the Druze community than among Shi'a Muslims, and less again among Sunni Muslims [150]. First cousins inherit one quarter of their genes from each of their common grandparents, and one eighth of their genes are identical by inheritance. The children of first cousin parents inherit identical gene copies from each parent at one sixteenth (6.25%) of all gene loci, over and above the baseline level of homozygosity in the general population.6 This degree of homozygosity by descent (or, more correctly, autozygosity) is expressed as a coefficient of inbreeding (F) of 0.0625. Double first cousin marriages, where the spouses have both sets of grandparents in common, also occur. Here 12.5% of children's gene pairs are identical by descent, i.e. F = 0.125. In the countries of the Eastern Mediterranean Region the preference for consanguineous marriage is by no means restricted to Islamic communities; first cousin marriage is also common in some Christian and Jewish communities and among Zoroastrians and Parsis. Uncle-niece and very occasionally aunt-nephew unions have been reported among Sephardi Jewish migrant communities in Israel [151,152]. Double first cousin and uncle-niece marriage involve the same coefficient of inbreeding in the children (F = 0.125), but as uncle-niece marriage is prohibited in the Koran, it is unknown in the predominantly Muslim countries of the Region. Data on the prevalence and types of consanguineous unions reported for the Eastern Mediterranean Region are presented in Table 5.1. The categories reported are: ? D1C, double first cousin (F = 0.125) ? 1C, first cousin (F = 0.0625) ? 1?C, first cousin once removed (F = 0.0313) ? 2C, second cousin (F = 0.0156) ? non-consanguineous (F = 0) The figures in Table 5.1 refer to the present generation only. Since the parents or more distant ancestors of many consanguineous couples were also consanguineous, the average coefficient of inbreeding calculated for each locality (F or a = S piFi) is a minimal estimate.7 TABLE 5.1 Parental consanguinity studies in some countries of the Eastern Mediterranean Region Country First cousins (%) Total consanguineous marriages (%) F References Bahrain ? 39.4* [153] ? 39* 0.0145 [154] Egypt 20.6 29.3 0.015 [155] 11.4 29 0.01 [156] Urban 8.3 20.4 [25] Rural 17.2 36.2 [25] All country 12.4 27.7** [25] Iran, Islamic Republic of Urban ? 37.3 [157] Rural 30 46.9 [157] Tribal 10.2 18.4 [157] Qashquais 52.4 73.5 [157] Iraq 29.2 57.9** 0.0225 [158] Jordan All country 32 50** 0.0225 [159] Urban 29.8 ? [159] Rural 37.9 ? [159] Muslim 33.1 ? [159] Christian 23.5 ? [159] Kuwait 30.2 54.3** [160] Lebanon Muslim 17.3 29.6* [161] Christian 7.9 16.5* [161] Pakistan 37.1 50.3 [162] Saudi Arabia 31.4 54.3* [163] United Arab Emirates 30 54 [33] * Details of beyond first cousin marriages not specified. ** Total consanguinity rate includes beyond second cousins matings. F: Average inbreeding coefficient ?: Data not available a) Genetic and social bonds for the woman at the start of a non-consanguineous marriage b) Genetic and social bonds for the woman at the start of a consanguineous marriage There is good agreement between estimates for prevalence of consanguineous marriage in some countries of the Region, e.g. Pakistan, but in others significantly different frequencies have been reported. This may be partly explained by regional or ethnic variations in marriage patterns, or by variations in the survey method, e.g. household survey or survey among obstetric inpatients. In some earlier studies, the small numbers interviewed and data collection only on first cousin unions could have given less reliable results. In general, since most of the data were collected in urban settings and consanguineous marriage is most prevalent in rural areas, the figures in Table 5.1 can best be regarded as minimal estimates of the current levels of close kin marriage in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Since in this Region consanguineous marriage usually involves marrying a cousin of some kind, the popular term "cousin marriage" is also used in this report when it seems appropriate. 6 In certain types of first cousin union, such as mother's brother's daughter (MBD), the coefficient of inbreeding at X chromosome loci (F x) may exceed the equivalent autosomal value. For MDB progeny F x = 0.125 7 a is the sum of the proportion of couples (P i) in each specific consanguinity class (F i) http://www.consang.net/bibliographies/demography/Demography%20Asia%20West.pdf http://www.iranica.com/articles/v9f1/v9f104.html Many groups have terms that translate easily as tribe (^l), section (taa@÷efa) and subsection (t^ra), and patrilineal ties are always privileged in theory, though not reliably in practice. In this connection ethnographers have sought to document marriage choice in order to fuel the larger anthropological discussion of the structural implications of particular marriage preferences, in this case for marriage with the patrilateral parallel cousin, or father's brother's daughter, whether first cousin or more distant collateral. But in general the data show simply a preference for marriage with any collateral, matrilateral or patrilateral, close or relatively distant. It is perhaps not surprising that the most conspicuous events in the life of nomadic communities are weddings. The reinforcement of existing relationships through marriage, and the forging of new relationships, are the most crucial social concerns in any community. The appropriate symbolization of weddings, as well as financial investment in them, are guarantees of social stability. This is perhaps the most important structural feature of Iranian society in general, but it is most crucial in nomadic situations where herding futures are at stake, and property is volatile. It is well documented in most of the sources (see especially Beck, Bradburd, N. Tapper). There is, however, also always the possibility of individual romance taking precedence over careful political arrangement, and occasional elopement is also documented (Beck). ----- posted by Charles Jannuzi Fukui, Japan ===== http://www.literacyacrosscultures.org http://groups.yahoo.com/group/literacyacrosscultures __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |