< < <
Date Index > > > |
Re: Civilization? by Romain Kroës 30 May 2003 13:37 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
It depends on the language. There is a difference
between culture and civilization in English and in French, but not in German.
For example, Sigmund Freud's "Unbehagen in der Kultur" was translated in
French as "Malaise dans la civilisation" (I do not know the English
transaltion).
I think it is a matter of philosophical ...
culture.
For German thought, "die Kultur" is a category of
same level as "Natur", as a consequence of human autonomy with respect to
nature. And Freud, after Kant and Hegel, opposes them to eachother.
French philosphy, that has never reached
the depth of the German one, does not consider such an
absolute opposition, and for that reason has invented the regrettable
"droit naturel" (natural right) which is a nonsense, as the right is a cultural
concept, invented by civilization and not promulgated by nature.
English and American thought, dominated by the
puritanistic will of God in the daily life, considers that culture is
somehow subordinated to nature and not opposed to it. And this is the reason why
we have to bear the ideology of "human rignts", in the name of which every thing
can be done, including barbaric agressions against civilization, and which
denies the rights of many citizens.
Last news: a new translation of Freud into French
is titled "malaise dans la culture". IL y a donc un espoir ...
|
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |