< < <
Date Index > > > |
Fw: Modernity and Politics by George Snedeker 27 May 2003 20:40 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
it is not clear to me why capitalism would not be a better term to use than modernity. why be so willing to grant legitimacy to a liberal discourse of the modern? all of the characteristics that people associate with modernity are actually features of capitalism as a mode of production. ----- Original Message ----- From: <samman@Macalester.edu> To: <psn@csf.colorado.edu> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 12:35 PM Subject: Modernity and Politics > Greetings, > > Lately I've become interested in the topic of the > politics of modernity. Europeans, nationalists, > settlers, and social scientists of all flavors have > used this concept so often that we can state the > obvious: "being modern" is the dominant self-image of > those who rule, accumulate, and produce knowledge. > The social science community is becoming more aware of > this and excellent work is now being produced on this > topic. These have asked "how modernity might not be > what it purports to be or tells itself" (Lila > Abu-Lughod). That is, the discourse around "being > modern" is a political project that rather than > emancipating and ushering in an age of progress is in > fact implanted by European colonialists and local > elites to enhance their social control over the > multitude. > > But what I do not see much of is the question of why > "being modern" may attract the attention of some lower > but emerging sectors of our world: white working > classes in the US, Zionist settlers in Palestine, some > western feminists ... > > Partha Chaterjee, for instance, does an excellent job > demonstrating how Indian nationalist elites used the > discourse of modernity to rule and appropriate the > technologies and science of the west while preserving > the interior, domestic, spiritual realm. But what > about other nationalist elites like Kemal Attaturk of > Turkey or David Ben-Gurion of Israel who reached into > the interior in an effort to purify the state from its > "medieval" and "backward" past? More importantly, why > do large sectors of such communities grap hold of this > discourse, like Jewish European settlers? Does anyone > know of any readings that deal with this topic? It > doesn't have to be on Israel or Turkey. It could be > global or micro. > > Thanks, > Khaldoun > > >
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |