< < <
Date Index > > > |
Proof of US hegemony and its decline? by Maximilian C. Forte 26 April 2003 21:00 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
In discussions with colleagues who are less persuaded than I am by some of the world systems litertature, I have recently been presented with several questions that I think raise some interesting problems. Regardless of my own readings in world systems analysis, I do not think of myself as an expert, and so I want to invite comments and/or references to literature. First, one commented with reference to recent articles by Wallerstein on the FBC website, what Wallerstein does is to stipulate that American hegemony is in decline, rather than to demonstrate it. Secondly, in a twist on this, one asked: was the US ever hegemonic? It surely has been dominant in many fields, but is dominance the same as hegemony? Thirdly, and I think this is where I began to find the issues more tricky, if dominance = hegemony, then the US certainly is dominant in military terms at least, and not exactly at the bottom of the food chain in economic terms. In all of these comments, I sensed that there was worry over counter-triumphalist triumphalism, of proclaiming the end of US hegemony or the end of capitalism (the two not necessarily the same), well before time, or in denial of evidence to the contrary. Many thanks and best wishes, Max.
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |