< < <
Date Index > > > |
Gore, Decorum and Humanity by Maximilian C. Forte 30 March 2003 03:45 UTC |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |
These are just some of my preliminary reflections on the recent "outrage" (as per CNN, Fox "News", US military spokespersons, and the NYSE which refuses admission to Al Jazeera reporters), over the broadcasting of images of US and British POWs and dead soldiers. Incidentally, much of this was also shown on CBC television while I was in Canada a few days ago, without as much of the sanctimonious outcry. For me, the problem does not seem to be one of the inappropriate display of gore, or lack of decorum. Showing interviews with US soldiers does not count as inhumane treatment (if so, tell me how), nor does it warrant the kind of indignation and duplicitous cries about the Geneva Conventions voiced by Paul Wolfowitz. It wouldn't even be inhumane treatment to expose the POWs to the same risks experienced by ordinary citizens of Baghdad: perhaps they should be housed in the luxurious and comfortable surroundings of one of the presidential palaces. As for showing the dead, well, that's actual war coverage, not sanitized press briefings used as a means to broadcast lies to "the enemy". I think that what irks most pro-war American and British viewers is that what is being shown is the destructability of Anglo-American forces, their vulnerability, and their mortality. The "progress" of this whole war has been jarring to their sensibilities: "they're not surrendering", "we were told they would welcome us as their liberators", "these aren't the people we war-gamed against", "we never expected so much resistance". The aura of invincibility has been shattered, just as easily as four or more soldiers were shattered by a suicide bomber that provoked one retired US Army officer to "comment" on Fox "news": "these are the types of sub-human species we are up against". The almost ballet-like execution of the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon--incidentally, what might also be called a "shock and awe" attack, a "pre-emptive" strike by Al Qaeda--almost demolished this sense of invicibility and supremacy. Box cutters, only 19 men? And yet, seven buildings demolished, one damaged, four planes hijacked, and almost 3000 dead--and those were just the most immediate, measurable results. No wonder then that, soon after, all footage of the events were almost completely expunged from US networks, and remain off air to this day. You don't want to remind the "lone superpower" of how alone and penetrable it really is. American military spokespersons and analysts loved to use phrases, in Kosovo and elsewhere, about "getting up close and personal", "getting in their face", or "reaching out and touching someone"...little did they imagine that as they spoke these phrases someone else was about to get up close and personal with them. The arrogant and brash announcement of plans for an even taller WTC will allow others sufficient time to plan for its re-destruction, I would not be surprised at all (not any more anyway). It may be the tallest building in the world, but for how long? Buildings, in this world, will soon have to be measured in units of time, rather than height. The pictures shown on Al Jazeera, no more shocking than the video of the beheading of Daniel Pearl (incidentally, the online video of that was linked to by some US newspapers online), reverse the complacency fostered by what actually does appear to be a renewed colonial racism against Arabs. In political chat rooms it was not uncommon to hear individuals laugh at Arabs as "pussies", "Arabs can't fight", "they surrendered even to journalists in '91!", exclaimed with real gusto--the effeminate Arab, savage, yet soon to be domesticated by "shock and awe" and "overwhelming firepower". We are constantly told that the outcome of this war is a "foregone conclusion". Is it? I am not so sure anymore. PS: An update on a personal boycott: in one day alone, insolvent as I am, the equivalent of $10 US went to France and China instead of the US, just from groceries. I hope the other 33,000+ signatories at www.adbusters.org are even more successful on a daily basis. All the best, Max.
< < <
Date Index > > > |
World Systems Network List Archives at CSF | Subscribe to World Systems Network |
< < <
Thread Index > > > |