Re: Propaganda or Fantasy Island?

Elson, you write well in this post.  I would say here, in response,
that it is less deception or distortion of information that is being spread,
it is more the attempt to force-feed a view of the world that no
one it appears really wants to buy, and those who do buy do so with the
reluctant assent that one gives to a bully.  Propaganda involves some
subtlety, some finesse, some tact!  Where does one see this anywhere
in either Powell or Bush or Rumsfeld?  No propaganda, just the threat
to use overwhelming force.  It is why even conservatives like Friedman
can turn critically against Bush.  Ganesh Trichur.

Elson Boles wrote:

Decide for yourself.  Propaganda is defined as "deceptive or distorted
information that is systematically spread."  Fantasy Island is an
isolated retreat where dreams come true.

A Feb. 19, 2003 New York Times article on the split over policy toward
Iraq between the US and nearly the entirety of the rest of the world is
curiously titled, "Neither Side Yielding in Debate Over War With Iraq."
But it is not the title that I have in mind, though it too qualifies
with its impression that there are two sides in the debate that are
roughly equal in size.  Nothing could be further from the truth.

It is rather a statement by Powell reported by the NYT that I have in
mind: "'It cannot be a satisfactory solution for inspections just to
continue forever because some nations are afraid of stepping up to the
responsibility of imposing the will of the international community,' Mr.
Powell said."

This statement is a textbook example of propaganda.  Powell contends
that "some" nations are opposed to the will of "the international
community" for a war on Iraq.  But this incredible view is the very
opposite of reality as details of the article confirm.  The
international community, with very few exceptions (and even those are
shifting), is opposed to the Bush Administration's plans for war.  But
the Bush hawks are deaf and blind, and they don't care.

For example, we learn in the same article that, "At United Nations
headquarters in New York, diplomats from 32 countries that are not
Security Council members offered their views today on dealing with Iraq.
It was the second day of debate, and as with the first, virtually all
speakers argued against war.  Among the countries represented were
Egypt, South Korea, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, and Canada."

Even Italy, the only Bush ally of political importance in Europe beside
Britain, warned Bush that he is isolating the US:  "Italy's prime
minister, Silvio Berlusconi, who has been one of President Bush's
strongest supporters, said today that he had recently spoken to Mr. Bush
'with candor and loyalty, as real friends do' and had 'invited him not
to cultivate isolationism.' As many as three million antiwar protesters
marched in Rome on Saturday. Afterward, Mr. Berlusconi insisted that
military action against Iraq must be carried out under the auspices of
the United Nations [that is, not at Bush's will]."

China and Russia are now even closer: "The official Chinese news agency
Xinhua said that President Jiang Zemin of China and President Vladimir
Putin of Russia spoke by phone today and agreed that conditions for the
weapons inspectors in Iraq had improved, and that the Iraq situation
should be resolved by peaceful means."

And "Switzerland announced that it had turned down an American request
for military overflights in coming months, saying the request could not
be approved unless military action was authorized by the United
Nations."

The article goes on to note the impact of the global protests: "Marches
by millions of antiwar protesters around the world last weekend greatly
strengthened the opponents' positions. Overnight, some diplomats at the
United Nations said that the United States and Britain would have to
postpone introduction of a new Security Council resolution authorizing
war because of Germany and France's implacable opposition, as well as
the less determined but still consistent arguments against war by China
and Russia."

And it wasn't France that held up Turkey's involvement.  Rather, the US
can't afford to buy off its Turkish ally as reported the same day in a
New York Times article titled, "US is Pessimistic That Turks Will Accept
Aid Deal On Iraq."  Specifically, "The leader of Turkey's governing
party said that the offer the White House described as "final" was not
yet good enough."

Thus, when Powell suggests that the Bush Administration has the support
of the "international community" he his is either knowingly
propagandizing or referring to the Bush's administration's isolated
Fantasy Island.

Elson Boles
Assistant Professor
Dept. of Sociology
Saginaw Valley State University
University Center
Saginaw MI, 48710